The "key" to your argument is not "appendages" but "property".
You argue that a woman has the right to kill the fetus because (as an appendage) it is her property. She could cut her arm off under the same reasoning.
Based on this "right to my property" ,I could kill my dogs by crushing their brains and no one should question me.
You destroy your own argument when you tell me that "Likewise, every animal's body is it's own property." Therefore I do not have the right to kill them ?
Don't you see that you give my dogs (property)the right to their own body BUT you would not give the fetus (property) the same right.
The "key" to your argument is not "appendages" but "property".
Wrong. I addressed that aspect in an earlier post.
You argue that a woman has the right to kill the fetus because (as an appendage) it is her property.
You're wrong again. My argument has consistently been that the fetus is an appendage. I never stated my opinion on abortion.