[terilyn]

No, I didn't miss any of it, and I never claimed to be an innocent bystander. Nor did I resort to name calling. Twodees highjacked UB's thread, (which he later admitted to and apologized for). I saw the initial exchange and attempted to refute his lies with facts.

Twodees claimed if Reg did it, he shouldn't have, but never would admit that he actually did, therefore it wasn't wrong. Even after Reg reposted all the info over at LF. Later he claimed I made the whole thing up. He ended the conversation by telling me I was dilusional and imagining things.

I'm confused. Why is ok for someone to call people a drunk, boy, dilusional, (and those were the nice things), but it's not ok for somebody else to post facts, links, and truth to rebut the name calling and lies?

The blindness by some is simply astonishing. When they do it they're defending themselves. When somebody else does it back, it's an attack. When reading this statement, keep in mind that Twodees, by his own admission, started this last night.

pot...kettle and all that.

[nopardons]

There are none so blind, as thos who will not see !