[berned]

Not to mention that your interpretation of Revelation is flawed.

Specifically, how so?

[AdA$tra]

Specifically how you ASSUME that you KNOW the anti-chist is the Pope. As if you wrote Revelations yourself. We argued this long and hard. You cannot get past the fact that your ASSUMPTION is just that an ASSUMPTION, a GUESS, an OPINION, not FACT. FACT is for God to determine. You read one or two sentences from one book in the Bible and to you, it ALL makes sense. You have a certain chance of being right, but unless you are God, you are merely GUESSING.

[RAT Patrol]

I read post #94. What is the problem? So what if AdA$tra thinks you're wrong about Revelation. You think AdA$ta is wrong.

Revelation is very difficult and no one knows how it will happen exactly. When I went to Logos at John MacArthur's church in California (non-denominational but very mainstream evangelical, conservative) and we studied the doctrine of end times, they said "know one knows for sure...you can still be a Christian and a post or au (spelling ?) millennialist...etc...but they were premillennialists as I am." It is good to read and study Revelation. It is not good to fight over it.

I have the utmost respect for AdA$tra!