Replies

>I exposed your views as fictitious nonsense

Okay, the 3-MINUTE HISTORY is only 8 paragraphs long. Here are the first 4. Please tell us exactly where you find "fictitiuous nonense" and then we'll go on to the rest.

Four Thousand years ago, Abraham (a great-great grandson of Shem, a son of Noah ) and a small group of Hebrews(of which there were & are many varieties) migrated from southern Iraq to Canaan (~Palestine).Several generations later, around 1853 BC, his Grandson Jacob (who was renamed Israel) and his 12 Sons and families moved to Egypt. As offspring of Shem, they were called "Shemites" or "Semites", as were his many other offspring.

~1453 BC, now as the 12 Tribes of the 12 Sons of Israel, and over 3 Million strong, these Semites bailed out of Egypt in the well-documented EXODUS and fled back to ~Palestine. But the Tribes “couldn't all get along” there, so ~922 BC these 5 Million Israelites split into the Northern and SouthernKingdoms.

(In actual numbers, 5 Million people is about the same size as Ireland, Norway, Denmark or Israel today, and was 10% of the estimated 50 Million world population at that time. The world population is now ONE HUNDRED TIMES as large. Compared to todays 6 Billion people, the Israelites relative population would have been over twice as large as the United States of America!)

The very large Northern Kingdom of Israel was made up of 10 of the Tribes. Inheriting the Kingly names which applied to all 12 Tribes before the split, the Northern Kingdom (alone) becomes known as the Kingdom of Israel or House of Israel, (also House of Joseph, House of Ephriam, House of Isaac, and House of Omri), and is led by the northern Tribe of Ephraim.

I went to your personal page. So, you're a radical Zionist. That explains your partisan rage, but doesn't explain why you would object to the notion that the Jews have millions of brothers and sisters in the covenant of Abraham. I would think it would give you a sense of security, if nothing else.

Since you obviously haven't done any study on the topic, your reactions must be purely emotional, which usually means the topic threatens you in some way. I'm sorry, I fail to see how it could be threatening, as I said, it would be just the opposite.

What's your problem? Is it possible for you to put into words and communicate it clearly without the emotive baggage? If you can't, then please explain why anyone should take you seriously.

Tribe is a Gene Scott devotee. Have you ever watched Gene Scott on late night TV? He comes right out of the Herbert W. Armstrong World Wide Church of God cult, and the people running around, calling themselves Jews really aren't, the promises in Deuteronomy no longer apply to them, just the Anglos who are the descendents of the lost 10 tribes. Watch or listen to a tape of "Dr." Gene Scott some time and arrive at your own conclusions as to his sanity.

And if you disagree with Lost_Tribes, the name-calling and dancing graphics will start in, because LT can't take any disbelief of his views. He can get very obnoxious.