Yes, I think you did, too. This individual - "ned"- was hardly a liberal disruptor, in my opinion. Someone who may have enjoyed having a little fun with people, maybe, but not a "liberal disruptor".
The only thing he/she did wrong was have multiple accounts, that I can see. If the penalty for that is banning and we all understand that, then no one can argue that he/she should still be here - but I was on a lot of Keyes and Klayman threads, and I never saw any evidence that he/she was doing anything out of the ordinary.
I looked at his/her profile pages, and knew right away that they were intended to be humorous.
He/She posted an article that was being discussed on the Declaration Foundation message boards that happened to originate from an oddball website, but that's not evidence of anything, in my opinion (except that he/she read the DF message boards).
I think a lot of unfortunate conclusions were jumped to in this case (and instigated by someone who had a big problem with "ned"). Now, that doesn't mean he/she shouldn't have been banned, but I think it's quite a leap to label someone a "liberal disruptor" or "anarchist" based on the information available.
Just my opinion.