Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Berkeley event to try for mass breast-feeding record
Sac Bee ^ | 8/3/02 | MICHELLE LOCKE Associated Press Writer

Posted on 08/03/2002 9:18:52 AM PDT by NormsRevenge

Edited on 04/12/2004 5:41:12 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

BERKELEY, Calif. (AP) - Breast-feeding advocate Ellen Sirbu wants to create a lactation sensation.

Sirbu and other city officials have invited hundreds of mothers and their babies to Berkeley on Saturday to try for a world record in simultaneous suckling.


(Excerpt) Read more at sacbee.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Political Humor/Cartoons; US: California
KEYWORDS: berkeley; bezerkeley; breastfeeding
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041 next last
"It's just going to be fabulous," :-|
1 posted on 08/03/2002 9:18:52 AM PDT by NormsRevenge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
Pathetic. And more evidence that liberalism warps the mind so much that even basic maternal instincts must be publicly bent to its sway.
2 posted on 08/03/2002 9:34:19 AM PDT by Eala
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
Why do people seek to shove THEIR personal issues in other people's faces? It's just so tiresome.
Also, the story mentions the woman nursing who who showed "too much cleavage"-- One need not show any. It is possible to nurse in such a way that nothing shows, so that people are only aware that you are nursing by the way you are holding the baby.
3 posted on 08/03/2002 9:47:16 AM PDT by Clara Lou
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
to try for a world record in simultaneous suckling.

Any cute girls out there who want to participate that don't have any children I'll volunteer my services for this noble cause. ;-)

4 posted on 08/03/2002 9:52:02 AM PDT by StriperSniper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clara Lou
A small sheet, blanket or whatever is used by modest women to fully cover up, but of course using discretion is deemed archaic and repressive to the morally-challenged in Berkeley.
5 posted on 08/03/2002 9:56:04 AM PDT by Sangamon Kid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
Should this farce be a "success," you won't believe the record attempt that will be proposed by the director of the city's supplemental infant defecation program.
6 posted on 08/03/2002 10:18:31 AM PDT by niteowl77
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
Just remember, if your kid is old enough to ask for it, it's probably time to stop putting the teet in his mouth
7 posted on 08/03/2002 10:26:56 AM PDT by realpatriot71
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clara Lou
I agree! They just have to push their agendas off on everyone else!

My first son who is 21 years old now, was breast-fed and still suffers from horrible allergies, my daughter (now 19) was bottle-fed and has NO allergies, my youngest (now 18) was bottle-fed and has allergies. They are all healthy as horses. The breast feeding made no big difference one way or the other, and since I HATED IT immensely, it was NOT a good situation. If you use sterilzed bottles and formula made with soy milk, according to directions, it is just fine. The whole "breast is best" issue came about in the first pladce because women in poor/undeveloped countries didn't have anyway to sterilize bottles and nipples and they often watered down the formula to make it go farther. That is not a wise choice. If you can't sterilize the bottles/nipples and can't afford to use the formula according to directions, breast would be the alternative. But babies grow up healthy either way. It is more important that you love them than which kind of milk they receive.

8 posted on 08/03/2002 10:35:52 AM PDT by buffyt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Eala
Socialists are obsessed with an individual'S production. TUrning motherhood into some cow 4H fair is their goal. Of course it is fabulous for the "farmers", the intellectuals of Berkley.
9 posted on 08/03/2002 10:47:42 AM PDT by lavaroise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Clara Lou
"the story mentions the woman nursing who who showed "too much cleavage"-- One need not show any." Do you want to set up a government agency to test women on their technique and license them?
10 posted on 08/03/2002 10:49:44 AM PDT by ConsistentLibertarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: lavaroise
Babies need to be fed. Breast milk is the best thing to give them. You can express milk but it goes bad if you're out for several hours. And we should encourage a baby-friendly culture.
11 posted on 08/03/2002 10:51:40 AM PDT by ConsistentLibertarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: buffyt
You can't make reliable inferences from three cases. Smoking causes cancer, but I'm sure you can find two smokers who lived to be 70 before dying in a car crash and a non-smoker who died of cancer at 40.
12 posted on 08/03/2002 10:54:14 AM PDT by ConsistentLibertarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: buffyt
The whole "breast is best" issue came about in the first place because women in poor/undeveloped countries didn't have anyway to sterilize bottles and nipples and they often watered down the formula to make it go farther. That is not a wise choice. If you can't sterilize the bottles/nipples and can't afford to use the formula according to directions, breast would be the alternative.

You have it backwards. Nursing is the natural way to feed a baby. Bottles and rubber nipples should only be used if the mother cannot nurse. People in undeveloped countries always nursed until formula was introduced, and most of these mothers still choose to nurse. Wise choice.

As for allergies, it is often just genetics, regardless of the the way a baby is fed. A mother's breast milk is, by far, the best nutrition for the human baby. The mom's body nutured him/her for 9 months and this is a continuation of nature's way of nourishing this baby. Studies are now proving what Mother Nature has always known to be true.

13 posted on 08/03/2002 11:17:39 AM PDT by Swede Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: ConsistentLibertarian
What about women that don't have cleavage. Can they bear all since no cleavage is present?
14 posted on 08/03/2002 11:20:29 AM PDT by mamelukesabre
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
This is a boring record.

Why don't they try something a little more competitive. Say for example, a contest that measures the amount of milk dispensed from a lactating breast. The winner would be the one able to produce the greatest volume of milk in a set duration of time.

Now that would be a contest!
15 posted on 08/03/2002 11:24:25 AM PDT by mamelukesabre
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Swede Girl
And in Europe breast feeding in pubic is a non-issue. Here's one case where America is backwards in comparison. How many years do you think it will take before we catch up on this point, if ever?
16 posted on 08/03/2002 11:33:57 AM PDT by ConsistentLibertarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Eala
And more evidence that liberalism warps the mind so much that even basic maternal instincts must be publicly bent to its sway.

Ya gotta admit, the private sector is at least partially to blame for its advertising propaganda that convinced women that their aritificial baby formula was in every way superior to what Mother Nature provides.

17 posted on 08/03/2002 11:47:14 AM PDT by Willie Green
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: mamelukesabre
Small cleavage, big cleavage, showing cleavage, hiding cleavage ... I can't see what the issue is here. We're talking about mothers feeding breast milk to babies.
18 posted on 08/03/2002 11:49:30 AM PDT by ConsistentLibertarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Eala
"Pathetic. And more evidence that liberalism warps the mind so much that even basic maternal instincts must be publicly bent to its sway." I think the point of the protest is to goad people into saying something stupid.
19 posted on 08/03/2002 11:54:19 AM PDT by ConsistentLibertarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ConsistentLibertarian
Please read my post with your glasses on. Where did I say anything about a government agency? Why don't you try reading what I said instead of what you think I said or instead of jumping to conclusions? [PS: I raised 4 children, none of whom were bottle-fed. I have experience in the matter.]
20 posted on 08/03/2002 12:19:37 PM PDT by Clara Lou
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson