Some time around 1980 I came to the conclusion that in news, "high-quality" and "video" are pretty much exclusionary.
And in the two decades since I do not think I've been wrong, though I confess I see maybe one or two television "news" programs a year now, loval and network combined.
If anything, the quality of video news seems to have declined into thoroughly leftie sensationalism and a bunch of empty-headed big hairdos happily yapping their ignorance before the uncritical camera.
Today my preferred general news sources are comprised of the WSJ, a local paper and... FreeRepublic. (Always with a grain of salt --check the sources!-- but with so many eyes out there reporting back...)