Skip to comments.
How Weblogs Keep the Media Honest
Washington Post
| 7-31-02
| Howard Kurtz
Posted on 08/01/2002 5:54:33 AM PDT by Lightnin
Edited on 09/03/2002 4:50:46 AM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
Bloggers are busting chops, big time.
The latest evidence: Some big media organizations are now quoting their criticism of other big media organizations.
It's called influencing the debate, in real time.
Web loggers, for those who have been vacationing on Mars, are one-person Internet blabbermouths who pop off to anyone who is willing to listen. They often slam each other like pro wrestlers, but some of the best take on
TOPICS: Editorial; Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: bloggers; mediabias
This is interesting except for the fact that Kurtz didn't recognize the growing influence of FR
1
posted on
08/01/2002 5:54:34 AM PDT
by
Lightnin
To: Lightnin
This is interesting except for the fact that Kurtz didn't recognize the growing influence of FR Maybe not publicly but Kurtz and lots of other journalists are bigtime LURKERS here.
2
posted on
08/01/2002 5:59:57 AM PDT
by
PJ-Comix
To: Lightnin
They often slam each other like pro wrestlers, but some of the best take on sometimes fairly, sometimes unfairly, often ideologically the big newspapers and networks.
And when a big paper like the Washington Post doesn't like it what is being said about it and how their writers are openly taken apart on a daily basis, they sue websites for "copyright violations"...
To: Lightnin
Sorry about that website referral:
It should read:
washingtonpostcom
4
posted on
08/01/2002 6:03:02 AM PDT
by
Lightnin
To: Lightnin
Looks like Howie Kurtz did a big-time ripoff of a John Leo column from a few days ago:
Flogged by Bloggers
5
posted on
08/01/2002 6:04:52 AM PDT
by
dirtboy
To: Lightnin
6
posted on
08/01/2002 6:50:42 AM PDT
by
beckett
To: Lightnin; PJ-Comix; Brian Mosely
On the plus side, Kurtz mentions and takes seriously both Leo's column and various blogs. There was a time when the Post wouldn't have mentioned the importance of internet commentary on the print media. On the negative side, he keeps referring to "Times bashing." Now the term bashing strongly suggests irresponsible attacks that are emotionally motivated. In fact, the sources cited make detailed factual criticisms, and whatever their internal motivation might be, it is wrong to say they are engaged in "bashing." Yes, it is colorful writing, but at the expense of accuracy (uh-oh, am I now a Post "basher"?).
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson