[yooper]

Sure they are. And so should conservatives be prepared for this answer:

Mr. Pangle himself was responsible for this accident. He alone was driving that car.

You can bet your ass that had Mr. Pangle survived the accident, he would be the one being prosecuted. The fact that he died necessitated the requirement to find another perpretrator. Absent the loaning of the vehicle, our friends in the law rackets would have attempted to hang this on some other entity, such as the maker of the vehicle involved.

[VadeRetro]

Absent the loaning of the vehicle, our friends in the law rackets would have attempted to hang this on some other entity, such as the maker of the vehicle involved.

Don't forget to sue the brewers/distillers, whatever. And the poor slob who owns the bar.

[Libloather]

Mr. Pangle himself was responsible for this accident.

Apparently not. A Liberteen pal of yours, AdamSelene235, said,"But as long as loons don't harm anyone or threaten anyone, I think they should be left alone."

Isn't a drunk driver a threat? And isn't the one getting him or seeing him becoming drunk more responsible than the drunk driver?