[Catspaw]

No, you're just someone who leaps to conclusions without evidence. You didn't happen to ask those two females if they were, indeed, "domestic partners," did you? If you didn't ask them, why did you conclude that they were "domestic partners?" Because they *looked* like "domestic partners?" (Oh, and of course some of your best friends are gay, uh huh.)

Your post:

Judge Morre should have been with me today. I'm not judging, mind you, just recounting an observation. I was picking up a few thing at the Ft. Belvoir Commissary this morning when something just struck me as odd. Two females. One, an army major in uniform, and the other in civilian clothes. My mind quickly discounted the possibility of sisters, two people from the same office, or just ordinary room mates. I thought at the time, if that's not a domestic partner thing going on, I'll eat my hat. As Seinfeld would say, "Not that there is anything wrong with that."

It should go without saying that, of course, I could have been wrong.

10 posted on 7/31/02 6:17 PM Central by leadpenny

[leadpenny]

Little over-sensitive about this subject, aren't we?

I was making an anonymous observation. No names. Said I could have been wrong. I got news for ya; we all make observations and form opinions based on those perceptions when we see people. It's normal. You don't have to be ashamed of it unless act on some impulse - like asking a pair of women if they are domestic partners. Right!!

I just related what my perception was. Get a grip. Got enough police on FR. We don't need Thought Police.