Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: palo verde; jriemer
I agree, palo....very intelligent posts. And why, again, did Holder keep his post? Oh, yeah....couldn't replace everyone all at once, as I remember. Now if guilty corporate individuals can offer up a Mea Culpa and go free, we're still in the Clinton time warp.

Thanks for posting this, JR.

20 posted on 07/31/2002 1:15:39 PM PDT by okimhere
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]


To: okimhere; Alamo-Girl
OK,

The change in the corporation rule happened in 1999 and according to Alamo-Girl, Holder's actions made Reno look like a choirmemember at the DOJ. Hard to even for me to believe.

The Asst. Atty. Gen. position requires Senate confirmation and I don't know if Holder was fired immediately after Bush was elected. If not, Holder was left in place to fester and contaminate the new Bush Justice Department. Based on the trouble that a Republican-dominated house had confirming Ashcroft, there might have been a concerted effort by the Democrats to let him corrode the Federal Justice system as long as legally possible. After Ashcroft was nominated, the Senate started to process the lower-rung nominees in the DOJ but Jumpin' Jeffords messed up the Senate and delayed Senate confirmations even more. I checked to see if Holder is still on staff but thankfully, he is no longer on the Federal payroll.

jriemer

24 posted on 07/31/2002 1:40:48 PM PDT by jriemer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson