Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

AMD confirms IBM DB2 Hammer support
The Inquirer ^ | July 30, 2002 | Mike Magee

Posted on 07/30/2002 10:34:40 PM PDT by JameRetief

AMD confirms IBM DB2 Hammer support

Corporate migration easier, says IBM

By Mike Magee: Tuesday 30 July 2002, 20:58

IBM'S DB2 DATABASE for Linux will be supported on AMD's Opteron (Hammer) processors, confirming benchmarks posted on c't magazine a few weeks back.

AMD confirmed the story in a release which said a DB2 database using SuSE Linux was successfully ported to X86-64 technology in just a few days.

The news is good for AMD and indicates positiive application software support for its Opteron servers, due to be launched next year.

The chip firm said that using X86-64 architecture will mean faster query response times and improved data loading/unloading in AMD server configurations.

IBM endorsed the move too, saying that DB2 running on an Opteron will give corporate enterprise customers a simplified X86 based migration path.

That's a slight dig at Intel's Itanium processor from IBM, we guess.

Intel's friend HP doesn't think migrating to Itanium is a problem at all, judging from this piece of spin here.

That's not what the Aberdeen Group, Intel's sometime friend, says here, however. This piece says that the Itanium "will require careful re-tuning and selective re-writing of a large mass of IA-32 Windows or Unix based existing code".

Migration involves 100,000 lines of code, four to six months, and something like $821,000 in costs including capital and labour costs.

As that minx Eva Glass might utter: "Sheesh!"

Rumours have circulated in the industry for several weeks that IBM may well introduce eight way Hammer servers itself, which would be a real boost for AMD, when the processors arrive. µ

see Also
AMD's Opteron scores IBM database win


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Extended News; News/Current Events; Technical
KEYWORDS: 64bit; amd; hammer; hp; ibm; intel; itanium; linux; techindex

1 posted on 07/30/2002 10:34:40 PM PDT by JameRetief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach; rdb3
Ping!
2 posted on 07/30/2002 10:36:09 PM PDT by JameRetief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JameRetief
Kewl! Hammer Time!

(insert mc hammer song here): Do, do, do, do. Do Do! Do Do! Can't touch dis!

3 posted on 07/30/2002 10:38:29 PM PDT by isthisnickcool
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JameRetief; *tech_index; Mathlete; Apple Pan Dowdy; grundle; beckett; billorites; One More Time; ...
Now things are getting serious!

To find all articles tagged or indexed using tech_index

Click here: tech_index

4 posted on 07/30/2002 10:52:22 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: JameRetief
I'll stick with RS/6000.
5 posted on 07/31/2002 12:41:58 AM PDT by SoDak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson