Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: John Locke
1) If you read my own commentary on the issue you would know that I did not consider the laws an act of ethnic prejudice but an attack on Theocracy and the authority of G-d.

2) Animals have no rights not given them by the Jewish G-d, their Creator. The same applies to humans. HaShem is the only reality. Everything else is His Creation. His Will is the only Law.

3) Unless you subscribe to the point in #2 you must consider the world a random, meaningless coincidence, in which case you have no business having any values, ideals, causes, or moral hang-ups whatsoever. There is no teleologically expanding "social contract."

That your namesake would have disagreed surprises me not in the least. It just goes to show how our contry was flawed from birth by the "original sin" of "enlightenment" and "rationalism."

8 posted on 07/31/2002 7:09:44 AM PDT by Zionist Conspirator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: Zionist Conspirator
our contry was flawed from birth by the "original sin" of "enlightenment" and "rationalism."

Uh, maybe you would be happier in The Religion of PeaceTM? They're all about the God's Law not man's law thing.

14 posted on 12/03/2002 3:56:05 PM PST by Stultis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: Zionist Conspirator
Next step: banning circumcision of Jewish male infants.
16 posted on 12/03/2002 4:02:32 PM PST by Alouette
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson