To: FreedominJesusChrist; justshe
"****If the presiding judge believes the case to be frivilous and without merit, they will simply throw the case out of court.****" ___________________________________________
"What does that Federal case have to do with tort reform and civil damages?"
___________________________________________
You're the one that tossed in the broad statement above. justshe pointed out a case that clearly disputes your statement.
Care to retract your red-herring comment now?
306 posted on
07/31/2002 9:08:33 PM PDT by
terilyn
To: terilyn
Like I stated before, what does this Federal case have to do with tort reform and civil punitive damanges?
Sorry if you forgot, but Supreme Courts, whether state or federal, do not have jury trials and they decide Constitutional questions, not tort civil suits.
To: terilyn
Notice she didn't adjust her attitude either.
310 posted on
07/31/2002 9:12:38 PM PDT by
justshe
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson