Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: FreedominJesusChrist; justshe
"****If the presiding judge believes the case to be frivilous and without merit, they will simply throw the case out of court.****"

___________________________________________

"What does that Federal case have to do with tort reform and civil damages?"

___________________________________________

You're the one that tossed in the broad statement above. justshe pointed out a case that clearly disputes your statement.

Care to retract your red-herring comment now?

306 posted on 07/31/2002 9:08:33 PM PDT by terilyn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 295 | View Replies ]


To: terilyn
Like I stated before, what does this Federal case have to do with tort reform and civil punitive damanges?

Sorry if you forgot, but Supreme Courts, whether state or federal, do not have jury trials and they decide Constitutional questions, not tort civil suits.

307 posted on 07/31/2002 9:11:03 PM PDT by FreedominJesusChrist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 306 | View Replies ]

To: terilyn
Notice she didn't adjust her attitude either.


310 posted on 07/31/2002 9:12:38 PM PDT by justshe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 306 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson