|
|
||||||||||||
 |
NEWS | SPORT | WEATHER | WORLD SERVICE | A-Z INDEX |  |
SEARCH |  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted on 07/29/2002 12:13:09 PM PDT by Sen Jack S. Fogbound
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
You are in: Science/Nature
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
Monday, 29 July, 2002, 11:51 GMT 12:51 UK
Asteroid to miss - this time around
It has been called the most threatening object in space
By Dr David Whitehouse
BBC News Online science editor
Astronomers have ruled out an Earth impact from asteroid 2002 NT7 on 1 February 2019 - but they say, as yet, future collisions have not been completely excluded. 2002 NT7, a two-kilometre-wide (1.4 miles) chunk of rock, was discovered on 9 July. Initial estimates of its orbit suggested there was a small chance of it colliding with our planet in 17 years' time. However, the latest observations accumulated over the last few days have confirmed the asteroid will fly harmlessly by. Dr Don Yeomans, of the US space agency's (Nasa) Jet Propulsion Laboratory, said: "We can now rule out any impact possibilities for 1 February 2019." Uncharted space But further work needs to be done to confirm that 2002 NT7 is not a threat further into the future. Dr Yeomans added: "While we cannot completely rule out an impact possibility for 1 February 2060, it seems very likely that this possibility will soon be ruled out as well." Analysts expect that it will be several more weeks before new observations allow a much better picture to emerge about 2002 NT7's future movements. This is because no past observations - that could be used to pinpoint its trajectory - have been found in astronomical archives. This is because the asteroid's unusual orbit takes it into regions of space that are seldom surveyed. But astronomers say that their concern about 2002 NT7 has not evaporated completely. Media debate According to Dr Benny Peiser, of Liverpool John Moores University, UK, we should not be celebrating too quickly. "It would be prudent to caution interested observers that further observations in the near future could result in new impact dates," he told BBC News Online. "There is even a very small possibility that the next set of observations may lead to new impact dates and a prolonged period of fluctuating impact probabilities, before the object will eventually be dropped," he said. The intense worldwide interest in 2002 NT7 has prompted a debate in the astronomical community. Following the object's discovery, and the realisation that it could strike the Earth in 2019, astronomers decided to make no announcement whilst they monitored the situation. Some astronomers have been unhappy with what they see as alarmist reporting in the media, and they say that the policy on public disclosure of such information should be reviewed.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dang...I guess I'd better go ahead and plan to do my taxes that year, then.
WE'RE ALL GOING TO DIE!!!
...eventually.
Hello!
Well, it is true that there are many parts of the world which are being dameged by nature or even human, yet, there are actually no more earthquakes, no more tsunami's, no more wars,... then before. More or less it is only a feeling, because we're just more informed and awared. The second thing is, that there are too many people on our little Earth and they (we) built flats, houses, buildings,... everywhere without any care. Not so many years ago, there were areas which were not inhabited and were flooded constantly - after a few years many people inhabited those areas without checking out about flood and such things...
It looks like this article was reported on July 29, 2002. Did the BBC just report on it?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
