Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. spokesman: Navy resuming interception of Iraqi vessels
Albawaba.com | 7/29/02 | Al-Bawaba Reporters

Posted on 07/29/2002 2:45:33 AM PDT by kattracks

Jul 29, 2002 (Al-Bawaba via COMTEX) -- After an eight-year break, a U.S.-led naval coalition is resuming inspection of vessels in the northern Red Sea because United Nations sanctions against Iraq are being broken in the area, a U.S. Navy spokesman said Sunday.

The decision is opposed by Jordan, which is Iraq's largest trading partner and which complained in the past that the monitoring hindered its trade, according to AP.

Lt. Chris Davis, a spokesman with the Bahrain-based fifth Fleet, refused to elaborate on the nature of the "sanctions-busting." Coalition forces in the Persian Gulf region long have been trying to prevent Iraqi oil smuggling and stop Iraq-bound cargo ships, except those carrying approved food, medical supplies or humanitarian items.

"There was sufficient evidence for us to believe that we should expand our interception operation to the northern Red Sea," Davis said.

A British warship was assigned on July 9th to monitor vessels outside Jordan's lone sea port at Aqaba, Davis said. Fifth Fleet commanders would not confirm if the ship had arrived.

A Jordanian Cabinet official said Jordan has not been informed of any U.S. decision to expand the monitoring operation to just offshore. But, Amman would oppose such measures because it already adheres to the letter and spirit of U.N. sanctions on Iraq, he said. (Albawaba.com)

By Al-Bawaba Reporters

(C) All rights reserved. Albawaba.com ,



TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: shipinterdiction
After an eight-year break, a U.S.-led naval coalition is resuming inspection of vessels in the northern Red Sea because United Nations sanctions against Iraq are being broken in the area, a U.S. Navy spokesman said Sunday.

An eight year break? The entire clinton administration fiasco. How did they know Iraq wasn't breaking UN sanctions that whole time? Or didn't clinton care?

1 posted on 07/29/2002 2:45:33 AM PDT by kattracks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Don't you know? I mean, the Gulf War happened on GHWB's watch, so of course, any 'collateral damage' involved such as this would of COURSE be his fault, not the bent one's. </sarcasm>
2 posted on 07/29/2002 3:40:04 AM PDT by DocCincy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Hmmm.... check out my key words 'ship interdiction' and you will see we've already been dabbling in it for a while. Tere's more than those articles if I can track them down.
3 posted on 07/29/2002 4:32:32 AM PDT by piasa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson