Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CONGRATS to NORTEL NETWORKS-From $80 to $0.80 a share
Jul 26, 2002 | TORONTO, (AP Online via COMTEX)

Posted on 07/26/2002 2:14:11 PM PDT by Swanks

From $80 to 80 cents a share - NORTEL is rated a "SELL" at $0.80...

-- A class-action lawsuit filed Wednesday accused Nortel Networks of overstating its revenues in late 2000 and early 2001, when the fiber-optic and telecom equipment giant first said it would fail to meet growth targets.

The lawsuit filed on behalf of three Ontario residents by the Toronto law firms Lerner & Associates and Rochon Genova names Nortel and its auditor, Deloitte & Touche, in alleging the kind of fraud that has shaken investor confidence in the United States after scandals involving Enron Corp., WorldCom Inc. and others.

It claims Nortel engaged in numerous improper accounting practices that overstated its revenues, and that Deloitte & Touche failed to have Nortel correct its accounting procedures or warn investors.

Nortel spokeswoman Tina Warren said the lawsuit was "without merit" and that the company would "vigorously defend" itself.

Dozens of class-action suits have been filed against Nortel, mostly in the United States, since the company announced Feb. 15, 2001, that it would fail to meet previous growth targets. Nortel's announcement set off an 18-month meltdown in which its shares lost billions of dollars in value, the company posted billions of dollars in losses, and the work force that once numbered 96,000 was reduced by almost half.

News of the lawsuit against Nortel came shortly after announcement of a new national panel to enforce tougher requirements for auditors of publicly traded companies.

The Canadian Public Accountability Board, which will include people from outside the accounting industry, will ensure audits get reviewed and lead auditors get rotated, according to organizers.

"The new system is based on independent, public oversight, tougher practice inspection and more rigorous quality control mechanisms," said David Brown, chairman of the Ontario Securities Commission.

Canada lacks a federal regulatory body like the Securities and Exchange Commission in the United States. Intended to bolster investor confidence, the new nongovernment panel brings provincial regulators together with federal financial regulators and the Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants, which determines the nation's accounting rules.


TOPICS: Business/Economy
KEYWORDS: classactionlawsuit; nortel; nt
I was there, folks. If you own any - sell even at 80 cents. The NORTANIC is about to disappear below the waterline.

Given THAT the only remaining staff(s) are managers whose lips were sown to the manager's a**es, there remains but middle management losers who cannot nor will produce anything.

The only saving grace if NT can find a market for the Powerpoint charts the remaining staffS ARE only capable of producing. BWAHAHAHHA!

1 posted on 07/26/2002 2:14:12 PM PDT by Swanks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Swanks
Come together right now over me. More funny memories from the Carefree Clinton years.

What a crock of crap. $80 huh. Try $80 X 2 splits = $320. That's a spicy meat-a-ball.

2 posted on 07/26/2002 2:32:54 PM PDT by kinghorse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kinghorse
I didn't think it split from the high of $8X. I think it went from it's high of $8X (2000), to $40 (2001) to $1 (2002). Could have missed splits....
3 posted on 07/26/2002 2:38:31 PM PDT by Swanks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Swanks
The only saving grace if NT can find a market for the Powerpoint charts the remaining staffS ARE only capable of producing. BWAHAHAHHA!

Well, You sure don't like Nortel.
4 posted on 07/26/2002 3:17:04 PM PDT by dr_who
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dr_who
Well, You sure don't like Nortel.

Yeah, you're right. I shouldn't be so tough. I mean, the management team DID manage to retain 1% of the stock value and only rode it down 99%. But after two years, let's give 'em two more; maybe they'll get the stock price back above $80.00

5 posted on 07/26/2002 3:43:45 PM PDT by Swanks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Swanks
Yeah, you're right. I shouldn't be so tough. I mean, the management team DID manage to retain 1% of the stock value and only rode it down 99%.

No, the investors did it due to a panic that exists and news of a lawsuit--not criminal charges or any finding of fact. That's about as rational as self-immolation. I happen to be related to a few people who work at Nortel, and I don't find the prospect of them being burned because of this funny either.
6 posted on 07/26/2002 4:30:17 PM PDT by dr_who
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: dr_who
No, investor aren't to blame Nortel Mgmt, is. They're to blame for buying software companies not worth spit, for $3B. Then having to sell it two years later for $200M. (Clarify) They're to blame for allowing nepotism; not sound business decisons, for determing who goes and stays.

I've seen them fire whole teams of consultants earing $150-$200 / hr ON customer sites; with work for the indefinate future. And not even notifing the customer. These people just didn't show up on a Friday. So the customers are pissed and will never buy Nortel again.But they kept the 'support staff' (expense) for these fired people (revenue) - because the supp't staff's mgmt. was 'connected'. They sit around and play solitare now since the revenue generators they supported are gone.

NT SHOULD be sued. But for allowing morons to impersonate leadership.

7 posted on 07/26/2002 6:21:12 PM PDT by Swanks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Swanks
No, investor aren't to blame Nortel Mgmt, is.

Possibly. Now that Nortel is a penny stock and not doing too well, how much do you think the class action plaintiffs will collect, assuming they win?

They're to blame for buying software companies not worth spit, for $3B. Then having to sell it two years later for $200M. (Clarify) They're to blame for allowing nepotism; not sound business decisons, for determing who goes and stays.

Fair enough. So whose son/cousin/uncle owned which company?

I've seen them fire whole teams of consultants earing $150-$200 / hr ON customer sites; with work for the indefinate future. And not even notifing the customer. These people just didn't show up on a Friday. So the customers are pissed and will never buy Nortel again.

Why do I feel like I'm not getting the whole story here?

But they kept the 'support staff' (expense) for these fired people (revenue) - because the supp't staff's mgmt. was 'connected'.

Did the support staff show up on said Friday? What does the client company have against them?

They sit around and play solitare now since the revenue generators they supported are gone.

Mmmm. Sounds like they make the perfect scapegoat.
8 posted on 07/27/2002 7:36:54 AM PDT by dr_who
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: dr_who
At least part of the cause in cases like this is ambulance-chasing lawyers who file against companies the day earnings are reported. No proof of wrongdoing -- nothing. They count on companies that can afford it to settle and avoid the publicity.

As an added bonus, the collect more plaintiffs after the stock bombs because of the suit spawning another round of suits, and so on, and so on...

9 posted on 07/27/2002 7:59:55 AM PDT by Doohickey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Swanks
When do you think they will file for bankruptcy? In a few weeks? or by the end of the year?
10 posted on 07/27/2002 8:04:47 AM PDT by Edmund Burke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson