Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Red Hat Shows a More Limber Linux
eWeek ^ | July 22, 2002 | Jason Brooks

Posted on 07/26/2002 5:42:36 AM PDT by ShadowAce

Edited on 04/13/2004 2:58:57 AM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

A new beta release of red hat linux, code-named Limbo, hit FTP servers earlier this month, giving users a first look at what is likely to become Version 8.0 of Red Hat Inc.'s most popular Linux distribution.

In addition to the latest versions of GNOME, Mozilla and OpenOffice, Limbo includes a nice set of new system administration tools, which significantly ease tasks such as X server, network and peripheral configuration.


(Excerpt) Read more at eweek.com ...


TOPICS: Miscellaneous; Technical
KEYWORDS: limbo; linux; redhat

1 posted on 07/26/2002 5:42:36 AM PDT by ShadowAce
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: rdb3
Penguin Ping
2 posted on 07/26/2002 5:42:57 AM PDT by ShadowAce
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ShadowAce
Back when AOL and MSN were non-Internet proprietary systems and Windows didn't come with a TCP/IP stack, I knew the Internet would be monster big when people who couldn't format a paragrph in Word (and didn't care to learn how) would call me up and start asking questions about MTU sizes and stuff.

When these same people start asking me about Linux, I'll know to short MSFT. Personally, I think that will happen about the time Palladium ships.

3 posted on 07/26/2002 6:10:35 AM PDT by eno_
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: B Knotts; stainlessbanner; TechJunkYard; E. Pluribus Unum; Knitebane; AppyPappy; jae471; ...
The Penguin Ping. Want on or off? Just holla!

Got root?


4 posted on 07/26/2002 6:11:10 AM PDT by rdb3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ShadowAce
This is excellent news. The open source stuff just keeps getting better and better.

Ever since my early days with a Radio Shack Model II (I know, no one in their right mind would buy one, but I did) and buying every copy of the magazine, "80-Micro", I have realized that it's the hobbyists that keep this thing alive. Every issue of "80-Micro" had BASIC and some Z-80 assembly language listings that us "computer nut-cases" could key in and run on our wonderful TRS-80's with that lightning Zilog Z-80A processor, smoking at 4 mhz.

The hardware forced compact programming and a heavy utilization of machine language routines...otherwise, at 4 mhz and 64 KB of RAM it would take all day to run.

Since then, with almost unlimited RAM and sizzling processor speed, "Bloatware" has become entrenched and the need to keep programs small, tight and fast is gone, except for a few programers who still insist on producing tight software.

Microsoft Windows (all versions) is the best example of "Bloatware" and it always has been. The system is way too big at installation time and to add insult to injury, it constantly claims more and more of you drive space as you use it. If you pay any attention at all to what's on your hard drives, you will notice it inflating.

5 posted on 07/26/2002 6:16:21 AM PDT by capt. norm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: capt. norm
*Chuckle*

Unlike you trend followers, I blazed my own trail by buying a Zenith Z-100 with the Z80 processor, the 8086 card and a whopping 128K of RAM. A year later I bought a 10Mb hard drive for it. I had to pull out one of the two 360K disk drives to make it fit.

It was a big step up from the Heathkit I had.

I remember that the DOS card was all elbows. If you were running in Z80 mode and switched to DOS, you couldn't switch back because DOS would grab all of the low memory space and wouldn't give it back, even if you terminated DOS.

There are a few programs that are still coded as tight as those we typed in or borrowed on cassete tape. Well, they aren't written in assembly, but they're still tight.

Go download a copy of the source for qmail or djbdns. I threw in the programming towel a long time ago, but my small exposure to C is enough to know really good code when I see it.

flamebait

Then again, if he was a real programmer, he'd program in COBOL.

/flamebait

6 posted on 07/26/2002 7:04:31 AM PDT by Knitebane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Knitebane
Then again, if he was a real programmer, he'd program in COBOL.

Real Programmers...


7 posted on 07/26/2002 7:29:04 AM PDT by jae471
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Knitebane
"Then again, if he was a real programmer, he'd program in COBOL."

You have given yourself away as one of us "cave men" who used to write COBOL by the mile. A typical program (fan-fold print-out) listing would be as thick as a telephone directory. Fortunately those miles of COBOL compile down to some machine code that the old IBM 'Frames' seemed to love.

And who could forget CPF...my favorite CPF error message. "Error ocurred during file transfer. Approximately 0 files were copied."
And it always was zero files...maybe IBM was being cautious, thinking a few bytes may have slipped through.

8 posted on 07/26/2002 8:56:24 AM PDT by capt. norm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson