Skip to comments.
Hollywood's descent into debauchery: Jon Dougherty rips movie portraying adult-child sex
WorldNetDaily.com ^
| Friday, July 26, 2002
| Jon Dougherty
Posted on 07/25/2002 11:43:45 PM PDT by JohnHuang2
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-76 next last
To: LS
LOLITA ?
21
posted on
07/27/2002 6:13:21 AM PDT
by
sushiman
To: teeman8r
a 15 year old boy will not suffer emotionally Boys can suffer from being used for sex by a much older adult. We wonder why there are so many divorces but we aren't teaching kids that marriage means something and that sex shouldn't require committment.
22
posted on
07/27/2002 6:29:41 AM PDT
by
FITZ
To: Chunga
But there aren't very many 15-year-old boys who can't overpower any woman who might desire a roll in the hay (should they wish); conversely, there aren't very many 15-year-old girls who can overpower any man who might desire sex with them.The same could be said about those 15 year old boys and the pedophile priests ---they could overpower them physically but the pedophile is also into mind control and seduction of children.
23
posted on
07/27/2002 6:35:06 AM PDT
by
FITZ
To: tpaine
Actually, these 'christians' seem destined to tolerate it, cause they obviously enjoy talking about child sex constantly. So tell me......why are you here on this thread?
To: teeman8r
men are different from women and boys are different from girls.... a 15 year old boy will not suffer emotionally from a concensual heterosexual relationship... MHO of course.Yeah right........a fifteen year old being lavished with the attentions of an older woman, who say suddenly decides that she doesn't want to play house.......boys and girls at fifteen are still developing mentally in this regard, and for a person of a more advanced sophistication to exploit this is unconscionable......and I guarantee you if it were your child in such a situation, you feel differently.
To: tpaine
I suspect its the 'titillation' factor, much noted in repressed fundamentalist type minds, which are also lacking in any underlying moral 'common sense'.Hey, I've got a great idea.........let's talk about this, and we'll see who is 'repressed' and lacking in any 'moral sense'?............Care to try?
To: tpaine
Their 'christian' pretensions are pathetic. - They are merely evil people.We can see about that also.
To: Mariner
I have to agree with you here :-). The truth is, and we like to joke and laugh about it (*wink, wink, nudge, nudge*), but most 15 year old boys would literally jump at the chance for that kind of action, and this is precisely the reason we have laws against this sort of thing. Young men could easily be taken advantage of by older women.
To: He Rides A White Horse
So tell me......why are you here on this thread?
I'm trying to defend libertarian philosophy from the slanders of pedophile obsessed fanatics.
-- You?
29
posted on
07/27/2002 11:13:28 AM PDT
by
tpaine
To: realpatriot71
Young men could easily be taken advantage of by older women.See 'Pamela Smart' for clarification, if any need to.
To: tpaine
What's funny is that this isn't even a case of pedophilia, and I don't see any libertarians defending this kind of relationship. The puritans are just paranoid (as usual).
To: tpaine
I suspect its the 'titillation' factor, much noted in repressed fundamentalist type minds, which are also lacking in any underlying moral 'common sense'. - Their 'christian' pretensions are pathetic. - They are merely evil people.Call it a converse, ready to dispel this nonsense sort of reason.
To: He Rides A White Horse
The Smart case is a good example I think
To: realpatriot71
Try addressing me by name next time. I'll respond.....promise.
To: tpaine
Aren't libertarians just conservatives without values?
To: He Rides A White Horse
Try addressing me by name next time. I'll respond.....promise.
Excuse me?
To: bribriagain
Libertarianism entails that the state must not impose traditional scruples through force of law; it does not entail that that such scruples are not valid. What is not legally binding on us may nevertheless be morally binding on us. Some libertarians may, of course, dislike and disagree with traditional moral rules; but others might believe strongly in them, even though they would not advocate imposing them on others through the power of the state, and they do not cease being libertarians for that
To: He Rides A White Horse
- let's talk about this, and we'll see who is 'repressed' and lacking in any 'moral sense'?............Care to try?
Sure.
Feel free to rant your repressions away.
And I'll attempt to correct any delusions you might have about
'libertarian' morals. - I doubt it will do any good, but I'll give it a short try.
38
posted on
07/27/2002 11:27:17 AM PDT
by
tpaine
To: realpatriot71
Exactly. They just use one of their favorite subjects [any 'illicit' sex] as a method to slur, then tar & feather their political opponents.
39
posted on
07/27/2002 11:33:47 AM PDT
by
tpaine
To: tpaine
Yeah, you know what tpaine, you have us pegged........don't tell anyone, but we modern Christians (as if we were any different from the others) have this secret agenda to paint sex as evil, you know, like God always told us. /dripping sarcasm
I know, it really is a good tactic for you to appeal to people's basest instincts, might even get you a few votes. (slap)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-76 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson