Actually, I just found out about the 4th. The blood on the jacket. I thought the jacket just had some fibers on it. What contradicts that ?
Allow me to clarify. The three points (all in the MH).
(1) the hair in the sink trap.
(2)The print under the edge of the cabinet.
(3)The DNA evidence. This is what needs clarifying. There was one spot by the bathroom that testing was done on and a DNA test showed a PERFECT match to DNA from Danielle. The second spot was on the JACKET, and a DNA test showed a PERFECT match to DNA from Danielle. There is still major debate as to whether either spot was BLOOD. The spots were way too small, were reddish brown-like in color, and (FROM WHAT I HAVE SEEN SO FAR) did not have tests done to prove they were blood (ALTHOUGH CYNCOOPER SAYS DIFFERENT).
She could be correct about certain tests being done, but others have stated that these tests can give false positives very easily. So, I guess it depends on what you WANT TO BELIEVE.
Anyway the two spots in the MH I listed as ONE POINT of yours.
Did that help?
Don't remember there being any fiber evidence taken from the jacket.
Here's the jacket story. Westerfield was on an erratic journey over the weekend. Between 7 and 7:30 a.m. on Monday, Feb. 4 he goes to his usual drycleaners and takes in comforters, some other kind of bedding and a green jacket. He takes his MH to the place where he stores it, gets in his SUV,which he left for the first time ever at the storage place (the guy who lives where he stores it says someone, usually Neal, came along to drive the SUV away when the MH was picked up and Neal verified this yesterday).
Westerfield drives home in the SUV and shortly the police arrive. He is asked questions, including where he was over the weekend, but he doesn't tell about the drycleaning trip. When the police leave he sits down at his computer for a bit (a tape recording of an interview later that day with a Det. Redden was made and portions played for the jury). He runs to the drycleaners again with dark clothes and requests same-day service but is told it is too late in the day so that's out. He does tell Det. Redden about drycleaning trip #2 but doesn't tell him about trip #1 either. He explicitly tells Redden he went directly to get his SUV and go home.
When the police get a warrant for the drycleaning stuff a couple days later it has all been cleaned. Yet they are able to get some evidence. The green jacket had 4 stains. 3 tested positive presumptively for blood, the fourth indeterminate. Two spots turned out to be Westerfield's and the third was Danielle's. The jacket had already been cleaned and was in the plastic bag. No fibers on it-----just Danielle's blood.
Also, the drag marks around the body were referenced again yesterday and it sounds like it is entrails---not huge drag marks of her whole body, from my understanding.