I agree its a puzzle. But a bunch of maybes and might have beens can't ever build into a "proof". Many of these pieces maybe from different puzzles. People are trying to force the pieces into a finished picture. But maybe here is pause for thought. People are not supposed to throw out all common sense. They can come to the conclusion that ther are too many "coincidences".
No one saw any children in the motorhome, her hairs in the sink, her blood in the motorhome ... but to me, the clincher ... her blood on his jacket which he just happened to DECIDE to take to the cleaners the weekend he disappeared EVEN THO she must have (if you believe him) dropped the blood months earlier.
One can accept only so many weird scenarios like this.
"People are not supposed to throw out all common sense. They can come to the conclusion that ther are too many "coincidences"."
I disagree, especially in a death case. "beyond reasonable doubt" which has been described as "to a moral certainty" is required.
I didn't realize that there wa BOTH blood on his jacket as well as blood or blood like subtance in RV. Where on the jacket ?