Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ernie pantuso
I have been predominantly a lurker on these threads since the trial began(I have not formed an opinion re: guilty/not guilty), but it has been my observation that an overwhelming number of "DW is guilty" posters have never questioned the plausibility of any State hypothesis/theory/witness regardless of the weakness of same.

My comments were about my evaluation, of how the JURY will see the evidence.

I am undecided. I think there is strong evidence against DAW, but there may be doubt, at the end. I predict a hung jury.

691 posted on 07/25/2002 3:11:23 PM PDT by truth_seeker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 675 | View Replies ]


To: truth_seeker
Looks like Lisa Bloom is even coming over to the acquital side.
696 posted on 07/25/2002 3:13:09 PM PDT by John Jamieson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 691 | View Replies ]

To: truth_seeker
I apologize if I misinterpreted your statement.
712 posted on 07/25/2002 3:19:22 PM PDT by ernie pantuso
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 691 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson