I have been predominantly a lurker on these threads since the trial began(I have not formed an opinion re: guilty/not guilty), but it has been my observation that an overwhelming number of "DW is guilty" posters have never questioned the plausibility of any State hypothesis/theory/witness regardless of the weakness of same.My comments were about my evaluation, of how the JURY will see the evidence.
I am undecided. I think there is strong evidence against DAW, but there may be doubt, at the end. I predict a hung jury.
Looks like Lisa Bloom is even coming over to the acquital side.
I apologize if I misinterpreted your statement.