When people are faced with complex calculations done by experts that they don't know how to reconcile they ordinarily average both answers and use that.
Agreed. So many on these threads get dragged into a detailed, complex analysis of each subject. The jury will usually not do that.
They will stay on the broader impression level. They will apply equal or different weights to different types of evidence and information.
The physical evidence is strongly against DAW, as a juror will see it, IMO.
Initially, the bug based TOD issue, was expected to be the strongest defense for DAW. By demonstrating there are different ways to estimate TOD, Dusek has neutralized the issue, hence averages work. Dusek is just as smart as Feldman.
Feldman, OTH, hasn't neutralized blood, dna, hair, fiber, child porn, cleaners, wild ride, etc. Or "forceful." Or son's damage to DAW's case.
Acquittal is getting more unlikely. Conviction is getting more likely. Hung jury is most probable.