Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Richard Kimball; All
OK, it's hard to address the questions one by one.

First off, bringing a Forensic Psychologist in to say that Pornography precludes rape/murder, just cannot be PROVEN. If Feldman brings one on that says "No, there is no proof that DW committed this crime because he viewed horrible porno"...then Dusek counters with "Well, but you can't prove that he didn't do it because of the Porno"..and the answer is No, you can't. It's a wash for either side. I know WE don't see it that way, and while we can speculate and use common sense, it is only an opinion, not backed up by statistics...or PROOF. Sort of like, just because I am into gun collecting, doesn't mean I want to shoot someone..But then again??

I listened to this expert. He is assuming alot of variables...too many. He goes thru the process of many different feeding cycles of animals and insects.

The last one, about the ants carrying off fly larva was true, but in this case, Dr. Haskell witnessed that the larva and life cycle of the blow-fly did indeed take place.

BUT if the ants were to carry off, let's say the very first cycle, around the time she should have been dumped, Feb 4th or 5th, then where did the ants go when Haskell did his investigation? If we are to believe that ants carried off all the larva evidence, then I guess there would never be any maggots on anything? THAT's alot of ants considering the amount of eggs the blowflys lay for those tiny ants to carry off...leaving no trace evidence. Remember that Haskell testified they find their "feeding" source usually within one hour after body is out in the open. And keep in mind, that the insects only eat on fleshy stuff, so once the body is totally dried up, the process stops.

The one outstanding thing the witness DID say, was there is absolutely no way to tell, from insect and animal activity, PRECISELY when the body was placed THERE. AGAIN, he goes on to explain that it depends on many, many things...insects, animals, etc., which may take time to start eating away at the body, or may not be present yet, depending on how hungry they are. OR different insects will actually slow down the decomposation of the body.

Are we not to believe Haskells findings? This guy has thrown in enough to confuse everyone, and that's probably the point. We'll see on cross.

sw

383 posted on 07/25/2002 1:02:05 PM PDT by spectre
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 174 | View Replies ]


To: spectre
BUMP...good rant...your Mayor...!
405 posted on 07/25/2002 1:12:07 PM PDT by FresnoDA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 383 | View Replies ]

To: spectre
Excellent post and questions spec...dusek didn't rest
before the break right?
507 posted on 07/25/2002 1:51:44 PM PDT by Freedom2specul8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 383 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson