Why would Feldman bring on a computer expert to testify when that testimony can be so easily refuted by Neal?
There´s been no attempt AFAIK for Feldman to explain the DNA evidence or for Dusek to explain the method of abduction. No Barb, which most likely means she would be a disaster for either side.
I haven't read all the testimony, but I guess the CD's and ZIP disks had no writing on them, or couldn't be compared in the way they were stored or archived to other CD's or disks.
The child porn revelations blows any sympathy I have for DAW out the patooty. I don't find the Van Dam's particularly forthright. I'm not saying sympathy matters, I mention it because I don't think any party in this case has exhibited a consistent pattern of behavior that I could consider trustworthy.
I would say if Dusek can explain the 'bug' evidence, DAW is found guilty, otherwise a hung jury, as you suggest, and a 'do over' when more evidence is available.
And ?, what ever happened to the drunkeness issue that was to be a major part of the defense?
longjack
Add to that the fact that DW did not take the witness stand. If he is innocent this was a BIG BIG mistake.