To: Henrietta; CyberAnt; John Jamieson
Ok..maybe this will help..(*pinging JJ cuz he's had the question about blood tests too*)
http://video.uniontrib.com/news/metro/danielle/transcripts/020624_am1.html
Q ALL RIGHT. WE WILL RETURN LATER TO WHERE THOSE LOCATIONS WERE.BUT DID YOU TEST THOSE THREE AREAS TO DETERMINE IF THEY COULD BE BLOOD?
A YES, I DID.
Q HOW DID YOU DO THAT?
A WHEN I IDENTIFIED THE BLOOD-LIKE STAINS WHICH HAD THE COLORS OF THE REDDISH-BROWN AND LIGHT REDDISH-BROWN COLORING, I THEN, AFTER DOCUMENTING THEM, PERFORMED A CHEMICAL PRESUMPTIVE TEST ON THEM.
Q WITH WHAT RESULTS?
A WITH OUT OF THE FOUR STAINS THAT GAVE THE REDDISH-BROWN AND LIGHT REDDISH-BROWN STAIN APPEARANCE OR COLOR, OUT OF THE FOUR, THREE CAME OUT POSITIVE FOR THE CHEMICAL PRESUMPTIVE TEST FOR BLOOD.
To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
OUT OF THE FOUR, THREE CAME OUT POSITIVE FOR THE CHEMICAL PRESUMPTIVE TEST FOR BLOOD.3 of 4 were blood, but what are we testing here, carpet or jacket? I remember jacket had 2 stains (or was it 3, *sigh*) but the one linked to Danielle did not test positive as being blood.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson