Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Rheo
All of your 1202 indicates this wasn't about child porn. I agree but it doesn't mean he didn't have another similar motive. If we are free to speculate assuming he did it, I'd vote for revenge and some perverted sense of control over Mrs. VanDam for her rejection.
1,206 posted on 07/26/2002 8:16:14 AM PDT by VRWC_minion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1202 | View Replies ]


To: VRWC_minion
I'd vote for revenge and some perverted sense of control over Mrs. VanDam for her rejection.

That is not the prosecutions contention tho...he did this because he was a pedophile and/or motivated by child porn.

Revenge might have been easier to believe but the state did not go with that....nor is there any indication that there was rejection.

1,208 posted on 07/26/2002 8:25:49 AM PDT by Rheo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1206 | View Replies ]

To: VRWC_minion
"If we are free to speculate assuming he did it"

That is presumption of guilt.

1,211 posted on 07/26/2002 8:35:30 AM PDT by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1206 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson