Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: shezza
A foot wide is certainly the width of a small child, I would think.

Feet or head but not body. I still don't get the dragging thing. Having to drag a limp small body and the leaning over and all required to accomplish that compared to the easier method of picking her up doesn't make sense. Unless possible to avoid transfering blood.

1,079 posted on 07/25/2002 8:22:38 PM PDT by VRWC_minion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1070 | View Replies ]


To: VRWC_minion; Rheo
Guess what I just did? I tiptoed upstairs and measured my sleeping 7-year-old son's back at the shoulders, his widest point, and it was 12.5 inches. And he's a broad-shouldered, muscular little guy, too. (Checked on all three boys while I was up there. In their beds, sleeping soundly--all is well.)
1,086 posted on 07/25/2002 8:33:28 PM PDT by shezza
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1079 | View Replies ]

To: VRWC_minion
Feet or head but not body.

Are your kiddos heads wider than their body ?

GIFS or JPEGS please.

1,111 posted on 07/25/2002 9:56:58 PM PDT by dread78645
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1079 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson