Skip to comments.
Bugs: The Best Witnesses? (Westerfield's Son Neal Forced To Testify By Desperate D.A. Dusek!!)
Court TV ^
| July 25, 2002
| Harriet Ryan
Posted on 07/24/2002 10:44:59 PM PDT by FresnoDA
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180, 181-200, 201-220 ... 1,481-1,500 next last
To: Spunky
Right, I'm familiar with that. I thought he was tying the time on one of the computers to it and saying the time on the computer didn't reflect local time? But I missed the context and will await transcripts or a summary.
Rodriguez on the stand. Anthropologist, works for the Dept. of Defense. Here testifying in a private capacity.
To: UCANSEE2; Mrs.Liberty; demsux; Jaded; skipjackcity; BARLF; Valpal1; FriarTom; DoughtyOne; Amore; ...
Ping to those who can't find us. Sorry for double pings..combined ping lists are to blame. :)
To: spectre
Travis, do you realize that there isn't ONE forensic psychologist who can link watching Porn, albeit disgusting, to rape/murder?If true, then why hasn't Feldman put on evidence, about this?
An article yesterday, in The Orange County Register revealed that Avila (alleged murderer of Samantha) had child porn, connected with the 2000 trial for child molestation.
People hold many feelings, beliefs, regardless of expert testimony, or absence thereof. I believe child porn falls into a category like that.
So unless Feldman puts on a strong expert, jurors are likely to connect child porn with these horrific crimes against children.
I have a serious question. Many on FR have made what seem to be good suggestions, for the defense. Yours surely falls into that category. Do you simply think Feldman isn't as sharp as you folks, and is just missing all of these opportunities?
Are some suggestions being passed along to his office?
Or could it be possible, that some of these items have been investigated, and have turned out to be not true?
I would think if it could be shown that no correllation exists between child porn, and child murder, that the defense would put it on. Wouldn't you?
To: basscleff
184
posted on
07/25/2002 10:44:31 AM PDT
by
paix
To: truth_seeker
So, what you are saying is that people who view child porn go on to kill children?
If so, then the investigators that view this junk, on a day to day basis, are going to kill a child at some point.
185
posted on
07/25/2002 10:48:34 AM PDT
by
demsux
To: truth_seeker; spectre
Spectre, sorry to see you have to leave
Truth_seeker, nice post...right to the point. I'm waiting to see if feldman will ever say dw's not guilty. I have a sneaky suspicion that DW confessed to feldie.. and that feldman is now bound by his state bar from saying "dw is not guilty" to the jury. (he can't lie to the jury) All I remember hearing him saying to the jury is that he will raise "doubt".
To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
Unfortunately, I think they CAN find us they just choose not to.
187
posted on
07/25/2002 10:49:01 AM PDT
by
It's me
To: basscleff
AMAZING discussions about the trial, ongoing now....WOW!!! Paging all Refugees....by invitation only!! LOL
To: truth_seeker
Current witness went to Kosovo as part of the "war crimes" investigation. Any chance he could nail clinton while we've got him on the stand?;)
Comment #190 Removed by Moderator
To: cyncooper
I believe the test they used test positive to potatoes and other items, and if the reagent is old, tests positive to anything. While rust or potatoes may not contain dna, a stain containing saliva and potatoes might IMO. Since Feldman did not attack the pros. findings, It seems moot and I will have to go with the evidence presented.
To: demsux; truth_seeker
PS, truthseeker, there are pleny of child porn collectors who don't act out their fantasies and kill kids. But often, child molestors/rapists who kill their victims do collect child porn.
To: It's me
....from both sides of the aisle.. :(
To: FresnoDA
Be right there, Fres.
This thread is boring the
cr@p out of me.
Comment #195 Removed by Moderator
To: Southflanknorthpawsis; Jaded
OK. Thanks for the info.
I couldn't remember whose witness Watkins was, and figured he was Feldman's based on the testimony he gave. That type of thinking proves the 'ME' part of the famous 'ASSUME' axiom quite nicely, thank you.
Dusek rebutted Watkin's testimony with Neal, then, as he should.
I think Neal's testimony is really damaging to his father. Feldman has to pull something out of his hat now.
longjack
Comment #197 Removed by Moderator
To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
Just got back. Who is testifying ?
To: cyncooper
Mummification being talked about, drying out, bacteria needs moisture..bacteria can't operate properly without..the body tends to dry out and be mummified like the ancient egyptians. Mummification can occur in dry or cold or warm environment.
To: VRWC_minion
You just missed it - Goff was on and agreed with the other two bug guys - Just kiddin.... it's some boring anthropolosist.
200
posted on
07/25/2002 11:00:25 AM PDT
by
mommya
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180, 181-200, 201-220 ... 1,481-1,500 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson