Bugs: The Best Witnesses? (Westerfield's Son Neal Forced To Testify By Desperate D.A. Dusek!!)

Court TV ^ | July 25, 2002 | Harriet Ryan

[VRWC_minion]

Was Westerfield neat freak or slob ? Neat

Then he would likely have hung up his jacket in the closet if he were home and not likely left out.

[Krodg]

They may weigh the same, but they're harder to carry.

[cyncooper]

AHA! Very good, Watson.

[185JHP]

Analysis of the interview by body language/NeuroLinguisticProgramming experts disclosed manifold indications of deception. Bundy was trying to "game" the good Dr. and get something for himself out of it. It didn't work, and the vile Bundy was executed without his telling where all the bodies of his many victims were buried.

[Rheo]

The blood on the jacket was 1 3/16 of an inch..in estimation, on the right shoulder....the lapel blood was inconclusive.

[EllaMinnow]

I missed the end of today's session.
What's the next court day?

[Rheo]

I know I read in someones transcripts that the drag mark was a foot wide....how wide are entrails and how wide would she be?

[VRWC_minion]

The blood on the jacket was 1 3/16 of an inch..

That is a pretty big spot. It doesn't seem like it would come from a minor cut while visiting. I would expect other spots of blood if it were that size.

[bolthead]

I have no idea. I think, he will basically agree with the other two experts.

Except why would the prosecution pay for Goff to come and support the others? Also there may be some professional jealousy involved. Goff and Haskell always seem to be on opposite sides. If I recall an article I read correctly, the last time Haskell's time of death was earlier than Goff's. It will have to switch this time.

[shezza]

A foot wide is certainly the width of a small child, I would think.

[rolling_stone]

That is a pretty big spot. It doesn't seem like it would come from a minor cut while visiting. I would expect other spots of blood if it were that size.

And since DW obviously didnt see the spor nor did the drycleaning person, does that lead one to believe that one spot might have been put there post cleaning? Indeed why only one spot?

[VRWC_minion]

Also there may be some professional jealousy involved.

Dueling banjos or two guys on same side trying to get gig for friend ?

[Rheo]

It would have helped to know if it was a smear, spot or what but they didn't have a splatter expert confirm.

The blood on the carpet was 1/4" in diameter, estimated.

Not a blood bath by any means.

[Rheo]

That's what I thought...back to the transcripts to find the reference to it.

[VRWC_minion]

Indeed why only one spot?

My assumption is that whoever did this wasn't wearing a jacket when she was killed. A also assume that the girl would have been carried in a sheet or something (I know there isn't one there).

If so, then most of the body of the person doing the carrying would be protected by the sheet but when he went to take off the jacket he might have had blood on his hands or his gloves and that would cause the transfer to collar area.

[fatima]

"PORNOGRAPHY.
This post is for all the hypocritical people that think they are so Lilly White and respectable, and that DW is a PERVERT because he had computer disks with files that were sexually oriented".
Please take me off of your ping list.I know of no-one who has CD's with rape of little girls.If I did I would report them to the police.

[VRWC_minion]

Not a blood bath by any means.

But the jacket spot is much bigger than anything I can imagine coming from a minor injury while on a visit with no one knowing about it.

[fatima]

"The WAY underage porn and child rape stuff was hidden among DWs business "Spectrum" files using DWs titling and passwords, it may or may not have ever been seen by Neil, but it was downloaded and filed and titled and hidden by DW. The computer guy yesterday was crystal clear on that".
Thanks Travis for this info.

[VRWC_minion]

A foot wide is certainly the width of a small child, I would think.

Feet or head but not body. I still don't get the dragging thing. Having to drag a limp small body and the leaning over and all required to accomplish that compared to the easier method of picking her up doesn't make sense. Unless possible to avoid transfering blood.

[Donzerly lights]

HE IS SAYING BASED ON HIS STUDY SHE COULD HAVE BEEN DEAD SINCE JANUARY 23.

So much for his testimony as everybody knows she was alive then.

What if Danielle had been kidnapped on Jan.1, killed sometime on or after Feb.1, and found, as she was, on Feb. 27? Rodriguez would have the same forensic information he had today. His findings would be the same even though none of us would know that she had been alive until Feb.1.