To: Andy Ross
No, as soon as it had something to do with the (U.S. subsidized) Israeli military.
7 posted on
07/24/2002 7:32:04 AM PDT by
Illbay
To: Illbay
Yeah, but the bile overflowed so quickly that you failed to notice that US funds could only have been used for the American rifle.
Andrew
To: Illbay
No, as soon as it had something to do with the (U.S. subsidized) Israeli military. As long as the dough is spent to kill your pali pal's, its money well spent.
31 posted on
07/24/2002 10:16:56 AM PDT by
68 grunt
To: Illbay
No, as soon as it had something to do with the (U.S. subsidized) Israeli military.
___________________________________
Take your Ritalin. This article is about a made in Israel weapon that has nothing to do with the United States. Though the US does provide military aid to Israel, at the same time we sell billions of dollars in weaponry to Arab nations and have been spending billions to defend Saudi Arabia and Kuwait. Arab welfare bum nations get far more money from Washinton DC than does Israel.
60 posted on
07/24/2002 10:44:33 PM PDT by
dennisw
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson