To: Bella; brigette; IamHD; Paladin; Sherlock; HoHoeHeaux; Illbay; Neenah; sandude; Utah Girl; ...
Ping
To: Jolly Green
I heard part of an interview on KSL radio today where Ed Smart said (for the first time, I think), that he is confident that Ricci is involved somehow in ES kidnapping.
Also said that whoever was working with him, hopefully that person is still taking care of her....
3 posted on
07/23/2002 10:11:52 PM PDT by
LakerCJL
To: Jolly Green
Ricci's wife holds the key here. She HAD to know that the things he brought home were not theirs. They didn't have price tags. She is used to getting stolen goods it seems and didn't "notice?" What else in their home is stolen? I think if they pressure her by arresting her for posession of stolen property she might break. She should be in jail in another location from her husband until she talks.
To: GovernmentShrinker
In yesterday's thread you said:
I doubt that it has been withdrawn. As I understand it, the immunity deal covered only a few days around the time of Elizabeth's disappearance. It never covered crimes committed at other times, and the new charges which have been brought against Ricci are all for crimes committed at times far removed from the date of Elizabeth's disappearance. The purpose of the immunity deal was only to try to ensure that Ricci was forthcoming about his whereabouts at the time of Elizabeth's disappearance, presumably so that if he didn't have anything to do with it, that could be determined quickly.
I tried to find some documentation on this and searched Yahoo, Google, Deseret News and Brigette's archives. Nothing. Can you provide a link?
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson