I never said " boys will be boys ". What I asked of you, was a) what are you going to do about it? b) Not to talk about this, as though it is something new and tatally unheard of . c)go learn some history.
Sooooooo, only Dems / Liberals are corrupt, steal elections, commit any type of voter fraud ? Not so. Unfortunately, there have been / are rotten apples on both barrels. The Dems ; however , seem to have a majority of these types, though. :-) You really , really, REALLY need to learn some history. No one debate with someone, who is utterly unfamiliar with the topic and replies emotionally.
Since you are so fond of questions, let me put one to you . Instead of the Fed trying to do something , and perhaps forstalling a major DEPRESSION and BANK FAILURE, would you prefer to have both ?
Please explain why it is, that you can't remember what you have written, and need me to repost what you have said.
Kindly stop twisting what I post, to suit your benighted and peculiar postions. Also, do learn how to use modifiers. :-)
Show me where I said I was going to be a rebel. You said "go out and do it". I told you why I won't.
I never said " boys will be boys ". What I asked of you, was a) what are you going to do about it? b) Not to talk about this, as though it is something new and tatally unheard of . c)go learn some history.
You act as if this is a normal occurance. It's not normal for one company to risk twice the GNP on a Democratic party reelection scheme.
Sooooooo, only Dems / Liberals are corrupt, steal elections, commit any type of voter fraud ? Not so. Unfortunately, there have been / are rotten apples on both barrels. The Dems ; however , seem to have a majority of these types, though. :-) You really , really, REALLY need to learn some history. No one debate with someone, who is utterly unfamiliar with the topic and replies emotionally.
Show me where I said that "only" liberals are corrupt. I'd give it 4 to 1 though.
Since you are so fond of questions, let me put one to you . Instead of the Fed trying to do something , and perhaps forstalling a major DEPRESSION and BANK FAILURE, would you prefer to have both ?
I love my country, my state and my financial prospects for the next few years. I don't want depression or bank failure. I believe that if a few trillion has to be wiped off the books because of this Clinton-Rubin scheme that there is a possibility of turmoil. Will this turmoil result in secession? I doubt it, it would be too bloody. Will this turmoil result in a neo-New Deal? I think it's likely. Can the private sector support a neo-New Deal? If it couldn't in the 30s, then I don't think it can now, and therefore if there is a neo-New Deal, I think there will be 20 years of hell, just like there was after 1929. WW2 was a result of depression, don't forget. The Dems and the lying media got us into this by not holding Clinton responsible for his actions leading to worse and worse crimes. How will middle America like bailing these liars out yet again, we'll see. If they can wind these derivitives down with no massive bailout, then these points are moot.
Please explain why it is, that you can't remember what you have written, and need me to repost what you have said.
What did I forget?
Kindly stop twisting what I post, to suit your benighted and peculiar postions. Also, do learn how to use modifiers. :-)
You're the one twisting, saying I've made proposals, saying I said "only" liberals lie, etc.