[gore3000]

Since you are an evolutionist (and any evolutionist is welcome to respond) perhaps you can elucidate a few things. The article accuses evolutionists of failing to define their terms. Could you help us here? Could you help us have an intelligent discussion and define:
1. evolution.
2. natural selection.
3. speciation.
I mean, the writer of the article must be absolutely wrong must he not? After all, evolution is supposedly science and scientist always define their terms very carefully and exactly.

[Dominic Harr]

Since we're all 'evolutionists' -- you too! -- I'd be glad to do my best:

1. evolution -- the idea that species adapt to their changing environment by means of natural selection.

2. natural selection -- the idea that the environment 'selects' which progeny of a species will live and which will die.

3. speciation -- the idea that after enough time, and enough small changes due to natural selection, a species will have changed enough from it's starting point to be considered a different species.

In laymens terms, there you go.

Now, wich of those do you disagree with?