NOTE TO ALL:
Bush has to condemn this publicly due to the death of children. However, if you don't think we are making high-level calls to Israel congatulating them on killing a very high level Hamas leader, you don't jack.
To: willgetsome
Exactly my point.
23 posted on
07/23/2002 8:23:24 AM PDT by
rintense
To: willgetsome
Nobody likes to see kids killed or injured on either side.Its time for the Pali's to realise that Israels going to come after them no matter what so its time for them to throw out the terrorists and make a deal.
77 posted on
07/23/2002 9:44:11 AM PDT by
linn37
To: willgetsome
"Bush has to condemn this publicly due to the death of children. However, if you don't think we are making high-level calls to Israel congatulating them on killing a very high level Hamas leader, you don't jack."
He didn't have to condemn the attack which was successfully executed with target destroyed. By merely sending a message of regret concerning the death of the innocent, Bush could have sent a real and deliberate message to terrorists and those who harbor and live with terrorists in their midst...'rid yourselves of them or be prepared to die with them. Terrorism will not be tolerated!' "You're either with us or against us!"
But rather, Bush chooses to acquiesce to terrorism when condemning actions of those fighting for their very lives against terrorism...all the while promising to work toward a state for those who terrorize...IOWs, rewarding their terrorism with a state of their very own pretending all will be well with the world when terrorists have a state of their own.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson