Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: PJ-Comix
I rarely bid on reserve items. It's like a trick. Why not just set the starting price for the minimum you'll take?
63 posted on 07/23/2002 3:24:12 PM PDT by Sir Gawain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies ]


To: Sir Gawain
I rarely bid on reserve items. It's like a trick. Why not just set the starting price for the minimum you'll take?

I like reserves because if you start your auction low you can get a few bids. People often will hunt through items and only stop on ones with bids. (I know I do that). I want an early bid to attract viewers. I will often take a good auction down and not relist it if it does not recieve a bid after 4-5 days (I usually sell on 10 day period for the extra 10 cent cost).

64 posted on 07/23/2002 3:38:06 PM PDT by LowOiL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]

To: Sir Gawain
I rarely bid on reserve items. It's like a trick. Why not just set the starting price for the minimum you'll take?

SIGH! I've been through this explanation before. Reverve pricing is NOT a trick. The fact of the matter is, many/most folks won't initially place a bid if you set the starting price at the minimum you will accept. Let me give you a solid example:

Several years ago I was selling lots of digital cameras on eBay. I wanted at least $400 dollars for the Sony Mavicas. The time I set the bidding at $400, guess what? NO BIDS. But when I started the bidding out at $2 or $5 dollars and set the reserve at $399, I almost always got $400 or more. Why? Because the bidding is like a ladder. Most people feel better if they slowly move up the bidding ladder by small increments rather than toss in the whole wad at a large inititial price. Is this rational? Perhaps not but that IS the way it is. And when I use this strategy, it works most of the time.

No tricks. It just makes the bidders feel more comfortable when I allow them to bid in increments.

65 posted on 07/23/2002 3:42:24 PM PDT by PJ-Comix
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]

To: Sir Gawain
I rarely bid on reserve items. It's like a trick. Why not just set the starting price for the minimum you'll take?

SIGH! I've been through this explanation before. Reverve pricing is NOT a trick. The fact of the matter is, many/most folks won't initially place a bid if you set the starting price at the minimum you will accept. Let me give you a solid example:

Several years ago I was selling lots of digital cameras on eBay. I wanted at least $400 dollars for the Sony Mavicas. The time I set the bidding at $400, guess what? NO BIDS. But when I started the bidding out at $2 or $5 dollars and set the reserve at $399, I almost always got $400 or more. Why? Because the bidding is like a ladder. Most people feel better if they slowly move up the bidding ladder by small increments rather than toss in the whole wad at a large inititial price. Is this rational? Perhaps not but that IS the way it is. And when I use this strategy, it works most of the time.

No tricks. It just makes the bidders feel more comfortable when I allow them to bid in increments.

66 posted on 07/23/2002 3:43:09 PM PDT by PJ-Comix
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson