[TADSLOS]

Marla Ruzicka, 23, an officially accredited observer from the Green Party, commented on the tactics of the Bush supporters. She described them as "really nasty. There was one guy with a bald head, like a skinhead. They surrounded me and called me a baby killer, because of my support for the right to abortion. When I pointed out Bush's presiding over the death penalty, they said: no, no, that's justice. They're scary. Maybe they're the ones who should be on the terrorist lists."

So this is where the NYT gets their reliable sources? BUSTED!! LOL!

[eno_]

Ah, the beauty of dealing with leftist dunderheads who think its still the days of the telegraph and if they are reporting from Afganistan they can just quote any Commie nut-case and have it accepted as the Voice of Reason.

Who's byline was on the piece? I bet we find out Marla Ruzika is his/her girlfriend, too.

[eno_]

Dexter Filkins also seems to have a monomania for Afgan collateral damage. Can't write enough about it.

[Shermy]

Hmmm...

I said back on January 23 "Keep an eye on this group's future propaganda."

Relatives of Afghan war victims hand over claims

This article has Medea Benjamin speculating on 4,000 casualties. Global Exchange was in a big hurry to Afstan to "find" civilian casualties, and to urge claims. What's their NGO cut?

more stuff about Global Exchange and Marla Ruzicka in this Feb 13, post 32 and after.

Afghan Victims of U.S. Bombings Demand Compensation

[Ragtime Cowgirl]

What a source, huh? Jenin, Gitmo, civilian casualties one and two...the NY Times is lying habitually. It would be really funny, except that it puts our troops in danger, undermines our authority overseas and consumer confidence at home.

Did you see how angry Donald Rumsfeld was today discussing the NY Times Iraqi war plan? Jail the CEOs if guilty, and jail the Times reporter/leakers as well. The Times is a bigger national security threat.

What undermines your confidence more? The accounting "scandals" or the Dems./media working to destroy the economy and the President for partisan political purposes?