It came across very phony to me, therefore I chose not to play their game.
Your very succinct defining of the matter SHOULD suffice. Why do I believe it won't? ;-)
A Sikh non-profit security company has the contract to provide security at 2/3's of the U.S. Federal Courthouses and these guys don't see a potential problem here. I never did find out if AKAL pays taxes,considering there non-profit status. Your initial impression was the correct one, I believe. Why do I try?