Skip to comments.
WorldCom files for bankruptcy - largest declaration ever; corporate assets at $107 BILLION
The Dallas Morning News ^
| July 22, 2002
| By VIKAS BAJAJ / The Dallas Morning News
Posted on 07/22/2002 3:27:03 AM PDT by MeekOneGOP
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
WorldCom: The World's largest CON. WorldCon.......
WorldCom's collapse began in late June, when it revealed that it had inflated earnings by improperly accounting for $3.8 billion in expenses for 15 months beginning in January 2001. The Securities and Exchange Commission has charged the company with civil fraud, and the U.S. House Energy and Commerce Committee is investigating the company's books dating to 1999.
To: MeeknMing

| Recent Events |
|
|
July 2 |
Price hit new 52-week low ($0.05) |
| Location |
|
|
500 Clinton Center Drive Clinton, MS 39056 |
|
|
Phone: (601) 460-5600 Fax: (601) 974-8350 |
|
|
Employees (last reported count): 61,800 |
To: MeeknMing
BUMP for further discussion.
3
posted on
07/22/2002 4:31:05 AM PDT
by
kitkat
To: kitkat
100B in assets, 40B in debt. Employees get cut, shareholders get nothing, big brokerages get ownership. Sounds like a scam.
4
posted on
07/22/2002 4:44:54 AM PDT
by
palmer
To: MeeknMing
BTTT
5
posted on
07/22/2002 6:29:25 AM PDT
by
TigersEye
To: MeeknMing
bump
To: MeeknMing
Is it my imagination, or did the government's attempt to save consumers money by fostering competition by breaking up the old phone monopoly just cost consumers billions?
7
posted on
07/22/2002 6:43:30 AM PDT
by
lds23
To: MeeknMing
Another BubbaBubble bursts all over the face of Bush. Another tool for the Demoncrats to use against the GOP in November.
To: lds23
Is it my imagination, or did the government's attempt to save consumers money by fostering competition by breaking up the old phone monopoly just cost consumers billions? Yeah.. how dare the Government try to act responsibly.. how dare them insist on honestly, truthfullness, and integrity!!!
How dare them not put the greedy people first, who created this mess. How dare them!!!!
Sheesh!!
To: Registered
Another tool for the Demoncrats to use against the GOP in November. Against the GOP? Anyone with a brain the size of a mouse, would know this started under the Clintoon admins watch. Even candidate Bush warned of this. I HOPE Americans are more savvy than this.. but we'll see.
To: Vets_Husband_and_Wife
Actually, I was referring to the 1984 divestiture of Ma Bell, and the subsequent Telecom act of 1996, which had all kinds of unintended consequences. Of course, we'll never know if the price of a phone call would have declined anyway, or whether wireless use would have grown anyway. But given the fact that the Baby Bells may soon regain their monopoly holds anyway, it seems like people lost a lot more in the market than they ever saved.
I agree that the fraudulent practices are at fault, too, but there are a lot of structural problems as well.
Courtesy of this week's Economist:
The great telecoms crash
Too many debts, too few calls
Exaggerated figures for Internet traffic inflated the telecoms bubble
11
posted on
07/22/2002 9:16:04 AM PDT
by
lds23
To: lds23
EXCELLENT articles. Thanks!!
To: palmer
100B in assets, 40B in debt Well, the $100B in assets is very misleading.
World Com lists current assets at $9B, and Plant and equipment at $39B, including the bogus $4B in capital expenditures. The rest of the "assets" are intangible and goodwill, which, with all the "good publicity" of how well the brands are doing, became worth next to zero once they took the tube.
So, after writing down the receivable from Ebbers of about $400 million, secured by stock worth $0.16 cents, and extracting the bogus capital expenditures, hard assets of $43B, compared to hard debt of about $40B, leaves slim pickings for the shareholders.
13
posted on
07/22/2002 9:37:53 AM PDT
by
aShepard
To: palmer
100B in assets, 40B in debt. Employees get cut, shareholders get nothing, big brokerages get ownership. Sounds like a scam. 50 B of those assets are goodwill which is inherently worthless, now back out the 4 B that was called capitalized assets that are really expenses. This brings it to 46 B in assets and 40 B in Debt. If the 46 B of assets on the books can be sold at say 90% their book value. The firm is worth nothing.
To: MeeknMing
If Worldcom has corporate assets of $107 billion, it's only because of AA accounting.
To: MeeknMing

"These many." -- John Sidgmore, the chief executive of WorldCom, in response to the question, "How many millions did you personally pocket before announcing the bankrupty of your company?"
16
posted on
07/22/2002 11:00:34 AM PDT
by
Silly
To: Registered
Sigh.............
To: lds23
Is it my imagination, or did the government's attempt to save consumers money by fostering competition by breaking up the old phone monopoly just cost consumers billions? It sure did. The only way MCI (and Worldcom) could "build" their networks after given the green light from the government to compete in the regulated long distance market was to borrow billions of dollars to buy right-of-way, switches, outside plant in the form of microwave towers (Microwave Communications Incorporated = MCI).
The phone companies and AT&T were saddled with 30 year amortization schedules. Not a good plan when you have to borrow billions to build the network.
Yes, you can blame the government for screwing up a good thing. It took longer than I expected, but it finally happened. The best solution left now is to divide the Worldcom/MCI spoils among IDT, Sprint, AT&T, and the Baby Bells. Name one industry saddled with government oversight that has ever succeeded.
To: palmer
I would question if worldcom really does have 107 in assets. They are not honest about the numbers.
19
posted on
07/22/2002 4:12:53 PM PDT
by
gaffin
To: khenrich
From what I've read, the government screwed it up in the first place by allowing AT&T to become a monopoly. Sometime around 1928 (or thereabouts, I'm not sure), there were dozens of phone companies, and none of them were wired together. So, you and your neighbor couldn't talk to each other on that new fangled contraption unless you bought service from the same company.
Seems to me that had they allowed another year or two to pass, that all those companies would have figured out a way to connect each other. Instead, FedGov stepped in, and chose AT&T to connect everyone.
So, later they try to undo what they had done, and we have today.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson