Many men who AREN'T the biological father are listed on birth certificates who are never called into court to have their names removed by a judge. Once a child bonds with a parent, a judge can't make that go away with a stroke of a pen. It HAS obviously happened here, and is highly dubious as to its legality.
Very interesting. You claim their case is at the 9th Circuit, yet RGSpincich says he cannot find any record of the Gaston's appeal to the 9th Circuit:
The Gastons have, however, been found guilty of defaming Ms. Hazel Spees and owe her $500k and change in the judgment rendered against them. Ms. Spees continues to teach elementary school with the full support of parents and community inspite of the lies publicly aired against her by the Gastons. No record of the Gaston's alleged appeal in 9th Cicuit Court of Appeals can be found by me. The true facts of the defamation case must be present in the appeal package. That is probably why the Gastons have not pursued it or have just not published the appeal at their site.
So to help us along in verifying that this case is actually at the 9th Circuit, what's the caption of the case? What's the appellate case number? Which judges have been assigned to the case? What was or is the briefing schedule? Where are copies of the briefs or an url to a copy of the briefs the Gastons have filed (they'd have to file two: their initial brief, then a reply to the respondent's brief)? Is this case going to be scheduled for oral arguments or is it going to be decided on briefs only? If it's gone to oral arguments, when is the hearing scheduled?
I can't imagine why the Gastons would keep this secret; however, this would also be public record at the 9th circuit and RGSpincich can't find a trace of the case at the appellate court. What's the deal?