Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Wolfstar
>>>>>>.At best, a group of polls taken over a period of time and averaged, might give an approximation of genuine public attitudes on the subject polled<<<<<<<

If that werew true, then Bush would have won in 2000 by about 5% and would have taken a number of states that went for Gore. I agree about the wording question order and all that, but Zogby is good. The sad truth is Zogby was right in 2000, Bush coasted on his lead and almost lost.

16 posted on 07/18/2002 12:19:02 PM PDT by irish guard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]


To: irish guard
If the Dems win Congress, then they will be blocking Bush, and setting him up to lose in 2004. A 2002 Dem Congress would encourage Hillary to run in 2004. If we got Pres. Hillary with a Dem Congress, the USA would never recover.
17 posted on 07/18/2002 12:24:47 PM PDT by DeweyCA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: irish guard
Gores campaign manager blames Zogby for Gore losing the election. Zogby's polling made gore go to california and campaign instead of going to Tennesee. Zogby believed that Gore would win his own home state, but was in danger of losing california (god that was stupid of them). He also told Gore that west virginian's are showing high concern about gun control and the enviorment. He talked like a enriormental ass and gun grabber, The concern these people has was about losing there fire arms and there jobs (they worked in the coal mines). Zogby is a partisian idiot who likes to believe dems are doing great, to the point of delusion which irrates many dems.
34 posted on 07/18/2002 10:39:00 PM PDT by Sonny M
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson