Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: eno_
The shoe bomb would not produce an explosion of that magnitude. That's the problem.
44 posted on 07/16/2002 3:45:15 PM PDT by Poohbah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]


To: Poohbah
You may be right. An Al Quaida op tried to take down a 747 with an improvized explosive a while ago and failed, but did kill one passenger. Some work, some don't. That's why they keep trying. WTC '93 didn't do the job, either.

So you were saying... why should I trust commercial aviation security to be able to stop the next attack?

47 posted on 07/16/2002 3:53:26 PM PDT by eno_
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

To: Poohbah; Orangedog; John_11_25; narby; zarf; Shermy; RobRoy
The shoe bomb would not produce an explosion of that magnitude. That's the problem.

Wasn't the operative theory that the shoe bomb would have caused a secondary explosion in the fully loaded center fuel tank?

IIRC, that's where Richard Reid was sitting, right over the tank.

That said, I don't know why #587 came down... but neither does anyone else. If the stories of the witnesses in this article are genuine (as far as their dealings with the NTSB), it's not going to help put the matter to rest whenever the official findings are released.




54 posted on 07/16/2002 4:20:04 PM PDT by Sabertooth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson