Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Origin of the Arab-Israeli conflict (my title)
The Israeli Classical Liberal Website ^ | 1996 | Noah Nissani

Posted on 07/16/2002 2:26:29 PM PDT by liberallarry

...When Turkey entered the First War World on the side of the Central Powers, Jabotinsky realized that a unique historic opportunity was opened for the Jews to demand their historical national rights over Palestine. He was convinced that only by fighting on the side of the allies under their own flag could the Jews attain these rights. Consequently, Jabotinsky organized, together with Joseph Trumpeldor and Pinjas Rutenberg, the Jewish Legion that fought on the side of the Allies and participated in the conquest of Palestine from the Turks. He enlisted in it, and was decorated for his feats on the battlefield. At the end of the war, the International Conference of San Remo (1919), conferred the administration of Palestine, over both banks of the Jordan river, upon Britain, given it a mandate to establish the Jewish National Home. This decision, later ratified by the League of Nations (1922), became the international legal basis for the Zionist enterprise.

Only two months after the San Remo Conference decision was ratified by the League of Nations, Britain separated the Eastern bank of the Jordan, spanning nearly four-fifths of the mandate area, where it established the Hashemite Kingdom of Transjordan. To make things more difficult, nearly three fourth of the Arab population was concentrated in Cisjordan, the remaining fifth of the mandate. As a result, Jewish immigration, now restricted to the most crowded area of the mandate, raised violent Arab opposition, and was drastically limited by Britain. This happened just after the Russian revolution, when anti-Semitism was increasing in Europe, and when nations all over the world were closing their doors to Jewish immigrants.

Jabotinsky opposed the policy adopted by the Zionist Organization, which was based on the Balfour Declaration. This latter expressed the commitment of the British government to the establishment of a national Jewish home in Palestine, in a letter from British foreign secretary to the chairman of the London Jewish community. This letter, from a member of the British government to a British citizen, was clearly an internal British affair that lacked international force. Furthermore, it was weakened by similar British promises granted to the Arabs (4).

Jabotinsky, on the contrary, advocated an international Zionist policy based on the legal rights conferred by the San Remo Conference. In Jabotinsky's opinion, fulfillment of Britain's obligations stipulated in the mandate, and opening the doors of Palestine to massive Jewish immigration were issues of international interest for liberal and anti-Semitic governments alike. Both realized the necessity for Jews to have a home. Since, the liberal governments were conscience-ridden for closing their doors to the persecuted Jews, and the anti-Semitic governments were anxious to rid their countries of their undesired Jewish citizens. Therefore, Zionist policy should focus on mobilizing international pressure against separation of Transjordan from the area designated for the establishment of the national Jewish home, and restriction imposed on Jewish immigration to Palestine.

According to this approach, Jabotinsky negotiated with the most notorious anti-Semitic governments, in order to facilitate the transfer of the Jews from Europe to Israel. In 1921 he negotiated with the exiled govern of Ukraine, which granted him permission to organize Jewish self-defense against pogroms. In 1934-35 he resumed the contact with the National-Socialist German government previously held by Haim Arlozorov, chairman of the Political Department of the Jewish Agency, who was assassinated in June 1933 after returning to Israel from Germany. The German government was disposed to allow and give political support to the transfer of German Jews to Palestine, whereas Weizmann (5) and other Zionist leaders opposed such non-selective and massive immigration. In a desperate and unfruitful effort to save European Jewry from the imminent Holocaust, Jabotinsky founded the New Zionist Organization in 1935. In 1937-38 he negotiated with the Polish authorities, who were disposed to give financial, political and logistic support for the Jabotinsky's plan to evacuate the Polish Jews to Israel.

In 1920 Jabotinsky organized the Jewish self-defense in Jerusalem and founded the Haganah, which constituted the basis of the Israeli Army in 1948. As a result he was sentenced by the British to 15 years of forced labor. However, worldwide public protest brought about his release after only three months in prison. In 1925, Jabotinsky founded the Union of Revisionist Zionists (URZ), antecedent of the Likud (Union) Party which now heads the Israeli government. The URZ opposed the policy of selected immigration (hachshara) oriented toward the creation of a Marxist society (4), and demanded the mass evacuation of the Eastern-European Jewry. In 1935, he founded the New Zionist Organization in a desperate effort to save European Jewry from the imminent holocaust....


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Israel
KEYWORDS: greatbritain; jabotinsky; zionism
A very different view of the origin of the conflict than we're used to seeing. Churchill was far more interested in establishing British oil rights than protecting Jews. Weitzman's opposition to German immigration should be explored. I never knew about this. My emphasis.
1 posted on 07/16/2002 2:26:29 PM PDT by liberallarry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: liberallarry
The origin of the Israeli/Arab conflict goes waaaaaaay back. Anything this article talks about is just the more recent problems.
2 posted on 07/16/2002 2:28:26 PM PDT by elephantlips
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: liberallarry
Origin of the Arab-Israeli Conflict

Mohammed
3 posted on 07/16/2002 2:29:07 PM PDT by polemikos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: polemikos
Ishmael. BTW, It also proved surrogate motherhood a failure,
4 posted on 07/16/2002 2:56:55 PM PDT by sheik yerbouty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: sheik yerbouty; liberallarry; polemikos
Brilliant abbreviated root-cause analysis of the entire Middle East and West vs. Islam situation! LOL
5 posted on 07/16/2002 3:26:49 PM PDT by FreedomPoster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: FreedomPoster
I type badly, sO I try and keep it short!
6 posted on 07/16/2002 4:03:49 PM PDT by sheik yerbouty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: elephantlips; polemikos
elephantlips, you are right - it goes waaaaay back to the days of Abraham and Sarah.

polemikos - mohammed got his revelation from an "angel of light", which the Bible indicates is from the devil. But ... Mohammed had nothing to do with the beginning of this conflict. He is just the instrument the devil has used to keep this stirred up; and the instrument the devil has used to try to DESTROY GOD. Not going to happen - I've read the end of the Bible and the devil loses.
7 posted on 07/16/2002 6:52:33 PM PDT by CyberAnt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: liberallarry
This letter, from a member of the British government to a British citizen, was clearly an internal British affair that lacked international force.

It was a British affair, but "lacking international force" was irrelvent. The land was Britains, there was no need for any international perspective at all.

Furthermore, it was weakened by similar British promises granted to the Arabs (4).

The British did not promise Arabs independence in Palestine. That was explicitly stated to Arab leaders more than once and in writing.

8 posted on 07/16/2002 8:19:35 PM PDT by monkeyshine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: monkeyshine
The British mistake was assuming that the Arabs could actually read.

L

9 posted on 07/16/2002 8:21:16 PM PDT by Lurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: CyberAnt; sheik yerbouty
Disagree. Without Mohammed, the Arabs would just be nomadic tribes. Aborigines of the desert.
10 posted on 07/16/2002 9:15:08 PM PDT by polemikos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: polemikos
I'm not disputing Mohammed's leadership of the Arabs. The question was "how the conflict of the Jews and Arabs got started", not if Mohammed was a leader of the Arabs. My answer is still correct - Mohammed was not the reason for the conflict between the Arabs and the Jews.
11 posted on 07/17/2002 12:41:33 AM PDT by CyberAnt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: CyberAnt
I'm not disputing Mohammed's leadership of the Arabs.

No one said you were.

The question was "how the conflict of the Jews and Arabs got started", not if Mohammed was a leader of the Arabs.

Your making a Straw Man argument. This does not negate my position in any way.

My answer is still correct - Mohammed was not the reason for the conflict between the Arabs and the Jews.

Your claim is unsupported so far. Read the Quran.
Without Mohammed, there is no conflict.
Without Mohammed, there is no dar el-Harb.
To blame Ishmael is like blaming the Big Bang.
Certainly they were contributing factors,
but they pale in significance. An error of Insignificant Cause.
12 posted on 07/17/2002 2:22:19 AM PDT by polemikos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: polemikos
"read the Quran"

Sorry, I don't have to read lies to know they are not the truth.

The Bible is the WORD OF GOD, and is much more trustworthy. Ismael and Isaac, the 2 sons of Abraham, are the true and real beginning of the conflict between the Arabs and the Jews. Hmmmm?? They lived a few thousand years before Mohammed.
13 posted on 07/17/2002 8:56:54 PM PDT by CyberAnt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson