Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Probable First Cause: Academic philosophers contribute to plausibility of belief in supernatural
Christianity Today ^ | 7/9/02

Posted on 07/16/2002 9:28:41 AM PDT by rhema

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

1 posted on 07/16/2002 9:28:41 AM PDT by rhema
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: *Christian list; *Religion; BibChr; logos; The Big Econ
BUMP
2 posted on 07/16/2002 9:29:35 AM PDT by rhema
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: *Christian_list
BUMP
3 posted on 07/16/2002 9:32:26 AM PDT by rhema
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: rhema
the probability of Jesus' resurrection at "a whopping 97 percent,"

Understand this: the probability of Jesus' resurrection is "a whopping 100 percent,"

4 posted on 07/16/2002 9:36:10 AM PDT by RightWhale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
the probability of Jesus' resurrection at "a whopping 97 percent," Well isnt that special....I'll bet the Lord was thrilled to hear the academics give him a whoping review...
5 posted on 07/16/2002 9:58:17 AM PDT by joesnuffy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: joesnuffy
the Lord was thrilled

I don't know if the Lord is thrilled with anything, but it's better than a lot of the things he hears.

6 posted on 07/16/2002 10:01:04 AM PDT by RightWhale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: rhema
"For some decades now, Swinburne has been arguing that while the existence of God is improbable, the nonexistence of God is far more improbable."

This sounds like doublespeak.

7 posted on 07/16/2002 10:02:44 AM PDT by MEGoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rhema
Hobbes said it best IMO.

fear of things invisible, RELIGION

fear of things invisible not allowed, SUPERSTITION

8 posted on 07/16/2002 10:46:11 AM PDT by aSkeptic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rhema; tortoise; Goldhammer; longshadow
A ping for some mathematically inclined freepers

Personally, I don't see how any such calculation can be anything other than a product of one's initial assumptions, but then again, what do I know? My Fields Medal hasn't shown up yet - the mail must be a bit slow around here ;)
9 posted on 07/16/2002 10:54:13 AM PDT by general_re
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rhema
How many secular humanist liberals does it take to reach an infinte ontological regression?
10 posted on 07/16/2002 1:30:46 PM PDT by HowlinglyMind-BendingAbsurdity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rhema
Mathematicians like to diddle around with whimsical ideas. It's when they publish them that they go wrong.
11 posted on 07/16/2002 3:24:03 PM PDT by Seti 1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: general_re; Godel; Junior; VadeRetro; Condorman; jennyp; ThinkPlease; Physicist; RadioAstronomer; ..
Theological statistics ping.
12 posted on 07/17/2002 1:43:57 PM PDT by PatrickHenry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: rhema
For some decades now, Swinburne has been arguing that while the existence of God is improbable, the nonexistence of God is far more improbable.

Definitely Douglas Adams' territory...

13 posted on 07/17/2002 1:50:12 PM PDT by Junior
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rhema
For some decades now, Swinburne has been arguing that while the existence of God is improbable, the nonexistence of God is far more improbable.

The secret word for the day is UNITARITY.

14 posted on 07/17/2002 2:08:31 PM PDT by Physicist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rhema
Well, if the guy's done calculations that's it then. I calculate the odds of his calculations being right at .00012 percent.
15 posted on 07/17/2002 2:08:43 PM PDT by VadeRetro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rhema
3% leaves plenty of room for atheists to squeeze through.
16 posted on 07/17/2002 2:10:44 PM PDT by VRWC_minion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VadeRetro
I calculate the odds of his calculations being right at .00012 percent.

Ah, I've run the numbers on my Banana 9000, and the odds that you are correct in your calculations of his calculations are a whopping 94.357%. Good show.

17 posted on 07/17/2002 2:24:32 PM PDT by general_re
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: general_re
Ahh! The Banana 9000! Sounds like something from Bloom County back when the Macintosh was making it's first big splash.

Do you suppose those guys from the future could feed me a few Lotto numbers?

18 posted on 07/17/2002 2:59:57 PM PDT by VadeRetro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: VadeRetro
I once knew someone who assured me, tongue in cheek, that they were going to win next week's Lotto drawing - it was a certainty. But then I suggested to them that they didn't even have to wait until next week - if they were certain to win, surely any bank would be more than happy to give them a loan right now against their future winnings of next week...


19 posted on 07/17/2002 3:11:14 PM PDT by general_re
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: general_re
Yep! Looks like my old 512K Fat Mac on legs. (Bought in spring of '85, thrown into a dumpster in '92.)
20 posted on 07/17/2002 3:30:59 PM PDT by VadeRetro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson