Janie's Got A Gun - AerosmithDAMON'S GOT A GUN
|
| Dum, dum, dum, oh no what have I done? Dum, dum, dum gonna buy a big ole gun. Dum, dum, dum, just wanna have some fun? Dum, dum, dum swing is not for one!!!! Damon's got a gun Damon's got a gun Run away, Danny away from the pain yeah, yeah yeah yeah Damon's got a gun Run away, Danny away from the pain yeah, yeah yeah yeah Damon's got a gun Damon's got a gun THE END! |
Although there has been much discussion of the blood evidence, there has been virtually no speculation about how Feldman will address the blood evidence which consists of an approximately 1.4" spot on a green jacket owned by DW and a very small spot in DW's motor home.
Here are some questions and speculationI have concerning the blood evidence:
1. Why did Dusek not present 'blood spatter' testimony? Could it be that such testimony would tend to support the defense, much like the insect testimony? If Feldman uses another prosecution 'hired gun' to make this point, so much the better for DW.
2. Was the blood spot in the motor home dried out befor it was deposited or was it still 'wet' and uncoagulated or just partially coagulated? If it was deposited 'dried out' and not stuck to the carpet, speculation that the bloody nose/dog scratch being the source of the blood is enhanced. If not dried out, certainly there would have been more blood in the MH and the dog would have certainly alerted inside the MH. If the blood was dried out prior to being deposited, the defense really has no need to establish that Danielle had actually been in the motor home.
3. Where is the blood evidence that indicates where Danielle was actually killed?
4. If Danielle had a bloody nose while DW was carrying her somewhere causing blood to drip on his green jacket, wouldn't that have been so obvious to DW that he would have disposed of the jacket, or at least cleaned it himself or disposed of it rather than taking it to the cleaners?
I think that DW would probably be found not guilty based on the testimony to date, but Feldman must address the blood evidence if for no other reason than plant the idea in the minds of the jurors that he is not trying to avoid it. One should never ignore issues and questions that one knows a decision maker(s) are thinking to themselves. Better to address them directly and provide answers that cast your position in the best light possible.