Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Judge Allows Danielle's Dad Back In Court: (Damon was banned for MAD-DOGGING Westerfield!)
North County Times-San Diego ^ | July 13, 2002 | Kimberly Epler

Posted on 07/13/2002 6:28:25 AM PDT by FresnoDA

Judge allows Danielle's dad back in court

KIMBERLY EPLER
Staff Writer

SAN DIEGO ---- The father of 7-year-old murder victim Danielle van Dam will be allowed to attend the remaining days of her accused murderer's trial, Judge William Mudd ruled Thursday.

But he warned Damon van Dam that one more incident will result in him being banned from the courthouse.


Two weeks ago, Judge Mudd deemed Damon van Dam a "security risk" for repeatedly staring down his daughter's accused murderer, David Westerfield, in courtroom hallways despite several warnings from sheriff's deputies and prosecutors.

Mudd then barred Damon van Dam from the third floor of the downtown San Diego courthouse where Westerfield's emotionally charged trial on charges he kidnapped and murdered Danielle is being held.

On Thursday, an attorney for the van Dam family requested that Damon van Dam be allowed back in the courtroom so he could provide emotional support to his wife, Brenda van Dam, and dispel any jury speculation that his absence meant he didn't care about the trial or that he had something to hide.

The van Dams were present at the hearing, but did not address the court.

Mudd said he believed Damon van Dam has had time to think about his actions and told him that security officials were willing to give him another chance.

"If I get one report of one incident, I will ban you from the courthouse," Mudd told van Dam.

Mudd also cautioned the couple that closing arguments in the case may push them to the limits of what they can handle. The prosecution has indicted it intends to use photos of Danielle's decomposing body while presenting its argument that Westerfield molested the second-grader before she was suffocated and her nude body dumped along a rural road.

Danielle disappeared from her second-story bedroom sometime after her father tucked her into bed on Feb. 1. The next morning she was gone. Westerfield was arrested for the crime five days before her body was discovered by search volunteers on Feb. 27.

The medical examiner has testified that her body was too badly decomposed to determine time of death or whether she was sexually assaulted.

The defense is likely to attack the van Dams' integrity and argue their lifestyle choices ---- including the van Dams' admitted drug use and previous sexual relations with other couples ---- put their children at risk. The van Dams also have two sons.

Prosecutors and the defense attorney have made it their practice to notify the judge before showing jurors graphic photographs of Danielle's body during the six-week trial so the van Dams could be asked to leave the courtroom.

Mudd said he expects the van Dams to leave if any part of the trial becomes too much for them.

"I don't think anybody is downplaying the emotion that both Mr. and Mrs. van Dam are going through," Mudd said.

Westerfield's attorney, Steven Feldman, said Westerfield did not object to Damon van Dam returning to the courtroom, but there still were security concerns. Feldman said Damon van Dam was "mad-dogging" the defense team, or shooting dirty looks at the attorneys.

Feldman said the van Dams have been "verbally attacking" potential buyers who are looking at Westerfield's Sabre Springs home, which is two doors down from their house. Westerfield signed the house over to his attorneys.

Feldman also accused Brenda van Dam of muttering a curse word at one of Westerfield's friends who testified earlier this week.

Prosecutor Jeff Dusek told Mudd that Brenda van Dam denies making any such comment and a victim witness advocate who accompanies her each day backs up her account.

Testimony in the Westerfield trial is on hold until July 22 when Mudd returns from a vacation. At Thursday's hearing, Feldman said he expects the defense will take two or three days more before resting its case. Prosecutors may then present rebuttal witnesses before closing arguments begin sometime in late July or early August.

 

Contact staff writer Kimberly Epler at (760) 739-6644 or kepler@nctimes.com.

7/12/02


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS: 180frank; vandam; westerfield
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 641-660661-680681-700701-707 last
To: BARLF
I saved your post and will read it tomorrow when I have more quiet time. I didn't want you to think I was ignoring you.
701 posted on 07/15/2002 9:09:34 PM PDT by Krodg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 698 | View Replies]

To: spectre
>>The background info on the Van Dams was so bad the judge wouldn't let Feldman introduce it...So I don't know what it is,<<

If you don't know what it is how do you know it's "so bad"? Or accurate?

702 posted on 07/15/2002 9:21:48 PM PDT by Greg Weston
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 699 | View Replies]

To: Greg Weston
>>The background info on the Van Dams was so bad the judge wouldn't let Feldman introduce it...So I don't know what it is,<<

If you don't know what it is how do you know it's "so bad"? Or accurate?

Good grief, give it a rest. He just said..."I don't know what it is." All he's stating is that it is of a perjorative nature, not that it should be admitted into court.

I'll let you know when an opening for a hangman/lethal injectioner/electrocutionist/marksman comes open, OK?

 

 

703 posted on 07/15/2002 9:30:18 PM PDT by Stiv
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 702 | View Replies]

To: Stiv
OK. When you find out you let me know what this stuff of a perjorative nature is. Then I'll decide how "bad" I think it is. Until then spectre can know it's "so bad" without knowing what it is all she wants.
704 posted on 07/15/2002 10:24:50 PM PDT by Greg Weston
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 703 | View Replies]

To: Greg Weston
Greg, my whole existance in life does not even come close to worrying about impressing YOU with what I can prove. You are a very ANGRY man...Have you considered a course in Anger Control? You are mad all the time...it is going to destroy your health...

Regards, sw

705 posted on 07/16/2002 5:39:16 AM PDT by spectre
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 704 | View Replies]

PS...I have to be gone for the better part of the morning. I'll read your stinging reply when I return...Not that I give a care what you say, it's really very predictable, just like the Van Dams are...:~)

sw

706 posted on 07/16/2002 5:41:24 AM PDT by spectre
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 705 | View Replies]

To: pyx
Heard the closet stuff on Fox News Channel...unfortunately here in NY the trial is not being televised or reported on much...only what we hear on FNC...
707 posted on 07/16/2002 8:02:24 AM PDT by KLT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 700 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 641-660661-680681-700701-707 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson