Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Judge Allows Danielle's Dad Back In Court: (Damon was banned for MAD-DOGGING Westerfield!)
North County Times-San Diego ^ | July 13, 2002 | Kimberly Epler

Posted on 07/13/2002 6:28:25 AM PDT by FresnoDA

Judge allows Danielle's dad back in court

KIMBERLY EPLER
Staff Writer

SAN DIEGO ---- The father of 7-year-old murder victim Danielle van Dam will be allowed to attend the remaining days of her accused murderer's trial, Judge William Mudd ruled Thursday.

But he warned Damon van Dam that one more incident will result in him being banned from the courthouse.


Two weeks ago, Judge Mudd deemed Damon van Dam a "security risk" for repeatedly staring down his daughter's accused murderer, David Westerfield, in courtroom hallways despite several warnings from sheriff's deputies and prosecutors.

Mudd then barred Damon van Dam from the third floor of the downtown San Diego courthouse where Westerfield's emotionally charged trial on charges he kidnapped and murdered Danielle is being held.

On Thursday, an attorney for the van Dam family requested that Damon van Dam be allowed back in the courtroom so he could provide emotional support to his wife, Brenda van Dam, and dispel any jury speculation that his absence meant he didn't care about the trial or that he had something to hide.

The van Dams were present at the hearing, but did not address the court.

Mudd said he believed Damon van Dam has had time to think about his actions and told him that security officials were willing to give him another chance.

"If I get one report of one incident, I will ban you from the courthouse," Mudd told van Dam.

Mudd also cautioned the couple that closing arguments in the case may push them to the limits of what they can handle. The prosecution has indicted it intends to use photos of Danielle's decomposing body while presenting its argument that Westerfield molested the second-grader before she was suffocated and her nude body dumped along a rural road.

Danielle disappeared from her second-story bedroom sometime after her father tucked her into bed on Feb. 1. The next morning she was gone. Westerfield was arrested for the crime five days before her body was discovered by search volunteers on Feb. 27.

The medical examiner has testified that her body was too badly decomposed to determine time of death or whether she was sexually assaulted.

The defense is likely to attack the van Dams' integrity and argue their lifestyle choices ---- including the van Dams' admitted drug use and previous sexual relations with other couples ---- put their children at risk. The van Dams also have two sons.

Prosecutors and the defense attorney have made it their practice to notify the judge before showing jurors graphic photographs of Danielle's body during the six-week trial so the van Dams could be asked to leave the courtroom.

Mudd said he expects the van Dams to leave if any part of the trial becomes too much for them.

"I don't think anybody is downplaying the emotion that both Mr. and Mrs. van Dam are going through," Mudd said.

Westerfield's attorney, Steven Feldman, said Westerfield did not object to Damon van Dam returning to the courtroom, but there still were security concerns. Feldman said Damon van Dam was "mad-dogging" the defense team, or shooting dirty looks at the attorneys.

Feldman said the van Dams have been "verbally attacking" potential buyers who are looking at Westerfield's Sabre Springs home, which is two doors down from their house. Westerfield signed the house over to his attorneys.

Feldman also accused Brenda van Dam of muttering a curse word at one of Westerfield's friends who testified earlier this week.

Prosecutor Jeff Dusek told Mudd that Brenda van Dam denies making any such comment and a victim witness advocate who accompanies her each day backs up her account.

Testimony in the Westerfield trial is on hold until July 22 when Mudd returns from a vacation. At Thursday's hearing, Feldman said he expects the defense will take two or three days more before resting its case. Prosecutors may then present rebuttal witnesses before closing arguments begin sometime in late July or early August.

 

Contact staff writer Kimberly Epler at (760) 739-6644 or kepler@nctimes.com.

7/12/02


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS: 180frank; vandam; westerfield
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 641-660661-680681-700701-707 next last
To: juzcuz
"Feldman says: "And in fact, Barbara Easton starts talking to Danielle Van Dam, and Brenda Van Dam later tells police "that was making me very UNCOMFORTABLE. I don't want her talking to my daughter." This woman talking to my daughter? Huh-uh. SHE DIDN'T EVEN KNOW HER." "

I thought that was because barbara and denise had just finished splitting a bottle of wine...and brenda didn't want the drunken barbara communicating with danielle because of if. That's the only time brenda pulled danielle away from her, right?

661 posted on 07/15/2002 8:14:12 AM PDT by Freedom2specul8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 659 | View Replies]

To: cyncooper
Cyn, do you have a link to the unsealed affadavits? Have they been put online somewhere?
662 posted on 07/15/2002 8:17:29 AM PDT by Valpal1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 568 | View Replies]

To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
Could be because of wine.

But,then again, we don't know how big the bottle of wine was, some people tolerance levels are higher than others. Some people who drink alot don't really show it. Do you think Barbara was a heavy drinker?? I don't know.. So much has not been gotten into, detail wise. It seems when details are given by witnesses, they don't make a whole lot of sense. This leaves lots of people like me, speculating about what really happened and who to believe.
663 posted on 07/15/2002 8:24:36 AM PDT by juzcuz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 661 | View Replies]

To: juzcuz
I think most people involved in this case have substance problems..from dw and his bar crew, to the vd's and their crew.

Good questions about her drinking habits and size of the bottle cuz details do matter! I just assumed barbara was wasted...They went to the garage afterwards to smoke a joint... and she probably got worse.

664 posted on 07/15/2002 8:33:27 AM PDT by Freedom2specul8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 663 | View Replies]

To: MizSterious
AFTER THE TRIAL BEGAN, SHE DID NOT SMILE AT HIM AND GET COZY. SHE SCREAMED, SHREAKED, GASPED, AND CRIED HYSTERICALLY WHEN HE ENTERED THE COURTROOM. IT WAS ONE OF THE MOST HORRIFYING THINGS I'VE EVER HAD TO WITNESS.
665 posted on 07/15/2002 8:34:33 AM PDT by fiddlesticks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: fiddlesticks
If THAT little performance was "one of the most horrifying things I've ever had to witness" convinced you, then it got the desired effect.

Quite frankly, what happened on 9/11 was one of the most horrifying things I'VE EVER HAD TO WITNESS..

sw

666 posted on 07/15/2002 8:45:23 AM PDT by spectre
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 665 | View Replies]

Oh..oh....(it had to happen sometime :~)

sw

667 posted on 07/15/2002 8:46:31 AM PDT by spectre
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 666 | View Replies]

To: juzcuz
Kim--

Who to believe--

Dusek asks Brenda: Q: " Is it the case that your relationship with her .... was such that you were uncomfortable when she was talking to Danielle.
A: "It just struck me as odd because she didn't-- she wasn't around my children that much...

Dusek is asking her if she was uncomfortable because of her and Barbara's relationship. It seems that Brenda is saying that no, it's odd because Barbara dosen't have a relationship with my children. the word "that much" implies that Barbara has been around her children before. She makes no mention at that time, of Barbara being drunk.

Also, If I remember correctly, Denise had drank the wine with Barbara. And yet, Brenda wasn't concerned if Denise spoke to Danielle. Wasn't it at that time that Denise bought GS cookies from Danielle?

668 posted on 07/15/2002 8:50:53 AM PDT by juzcuz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 663 | View Replies]

To: spectre
Well, the 666 strikes yet again..one of the best of us.

Should we compare 9/11 to this? I think the reactions of the parents in this case could easily be compared to other kidnapping/abduction/rape/molestation/murder cases--how did those parents hold up while filled with anti-depressants and xanax..Just my opinion

669 posted on 07/15/2002 8:54:10 AM PDT by Freedom2specul8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 666 | View Replies]

To: spectre
You are the winner of the 666 post.

The prize: Fresno may or may not post the calendar.

670 posted on 07/15/2002 9:03:33 AM PDT by Jaded
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 666 | View Replies]

To: juzcuz
True, her words "that much" does imply been around before. I don't remember denise buying cookies. I'd like to reread the comments, or who was it that said barbara and denise shared a bottle of wine before driving to brendas?
671 posted on 07/15/2002 9:04:34 AM PDT by Freedom2specul8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 668 | View Replies]

To: Jaded
I should have KNOWN better. I accept your congraulations with the deepest of humility...knowing it can happen to "the best of us"....uggghhh!

sw

672 posted on 07/15/2002 9:08:28 AM PDT by spectre
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 670 | View Replies]

To: Jaded
A bona fide stealth ninja would'nt have hair, blood, child porn and carpet fibers linking him/herself to a murdered individual.

David is more like a clumsy stooge.
673 posted on 07/15/2002 9:08:46 AM PDT by fiddlesticks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 656 | View Replies]

To: fiddlesticks
I'm still waiting for the estimable Misters Dusek and Clarke explain how Stealth Ninja Dave pulled this off. All of the best rumors turned out to be false including the neat-freak-ocd thing. Although, I must admit I was quite impressed with the organization of the shoes in the closet. I must strive to achieve that level of organization and quit kicking my shoes off in front of the closet. Really, it boggles the mind.
674 posted on 07/15/2002 9:14:13 AM PDT by Jaded
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 673 | View Replies]

To: fiddlesticks
You are right. Please point out the place in the Van Dam house that shows us where Mr. Westerfield left any of this evidence?

sw

675 posted on 07/15/2002 9:20:49 AM PDT by spectre
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 673 | View Replies]

To: Jaded
LOL! That's exactly what I plan on doing today, arranging the shoes in my closet. DW inspired me.

Could you just imagine the big, neat guy, lurking in Danielle's closet, resisting the urge to organize it? Now, if her closet was rearranged, THEN I might start to think he was in there....

sw

676 posted on 07/15/2002 9:24:44 AM PDT by spectre
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 674 | View Replies]

To: spectre
"Could you just imagine the big, neat guy, lurking in Danielle's closet, resisting the urge to organize it? Now, if her closet was rearranged, THEN I might start to think he was in there....
"

LOL! You're too much!

677 posted on 07/15/2002 10:04:45 AM PDT by gigi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 676 | View Replies]

To: dread78645
No, I think he is going to claim that the rain rehydraded the body and hatched more flys locally, both making it a likely day for the flys to lay eggs. I don't buy it, but I think that's going to be his line.
678 posted on 07/15/2002 12:15:49 PM PDT by John Jamieson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 648 | View Replies]

To: John Jamieson
Yeah, I like Rikki too!

She is their token

679 posted on 07/15/2002 12:16:42 PM PDT by RnMomof7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 634 | View Replies]

To: FresnoDA
How about "Blow Flies don't Lie" to the tune of "Big Girls don't cry"
680 posted on 07/15/2002 12:24:58 PM PDT by John Jamieson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 678 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 641-660661-680681-700701-707 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson