Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Judge Allows Danielle's Dad Back In Court: (Damon was banned for MAD-DOGGING Westerfield!)
North County Times-San Diego ^ | July 13, 2002 | Kimberly Epler

Posted on 07/13/2002 6:28:25 AM PDT by FresnoDA

Judge allows Danielle's dad back in court

KIMBERLY EPLER
Staff Writer

SAN DIEGO ---- The father of 7-year-old murder victim Danielle van Dam will be allowed to attend the remaining days of her accused murderer's trial, Judge William Mudd ruled Thursday.

But he warned Damon van Dam that one more incident will result in him being banned from the courthouse.


Two weeks ago, Judge Mudd deemed Damon van Dam a "security risk" for repeatedly staring down his daughter's accused murderer, David Westerfield, in courtroom hallways despite several warnings from sheriff's deputies and prosecutors.

Mudd then barred Damon van Dam from the third floor of the downtown San Diego courthouse where Westerfield's emotionally charged trial on charges he kidnapped and murdered Danielle is being held.

On Thursday, an attorney for the van Dam family requested that Damon van Dam be allowed back in the courtroom so he could provide emotional support to his wife, Brenda van Dam, and dispel any jury speculation that his absence meant he didn't care about the trial or that he had something to hide.

The van Dams were present at the hearing, but did not address the court.

Mudd said he believed Damon van Dam has had time to think about his actions and told him that security officials were willing to give him another chance.

"If I get one report of one incident, I will ban you from the courthouse," Mudd told van Dam.

Mudd also cautioned the couple that closing arguments in the case may push them to the limits of what they can handle. The prosecution has indicted it intends to use photos of Danielle's decomposing body while presenting its argument that Westerfield molested the second-grader before she was suffocated and her nude body dumped along a rural road.

Danielle disappeared from her second-story bedroom sometime after her father tucked her into bed on Feb. 1. The next morning she was gone. Westerfield was arrested for the crime five days before her body was discovered by search volunteers on Feb. 27.

The medical examiner has testified that her body was too badly decomposed to determine time of death or whether she was sexually assaulted.

The defense is likely to attack the van Dams' integrity and argue their lifestyle choices ---- including the van Dams' admitted drug use and previous sexual relations with other couples ---- put their children at risk. The van Dams also have two sons.

Prosecutors and the defense attorney have made it their practice to notify the judge before showing jurors graphic photographs of Danielle's body during the six-week trial so the van Dams could be asked to leave the courtroom.

Mudd said he expects the van Dams to leave if any part of the trial becomes too much for them.

"I don't think anybody is downplaying the emotion that both Mr. and Mrs. van Dam are going through," Mudd said.

Westerfield's attorney, Steven Feldman, said Westerfield did not object to Damon van Dam returning to the courtroom, but there still were security concerns. Feldman said Damon van Dam was "mad-dogging" the defense team, or shooting dirty looks at the attorneys.

Feldman said the van Dams have been "verbally attacking" potential buyers who are looking at Westerfield's Sabre Springs home, which is two doors down from their house. Westerfield signed the house over to his attorneys.

Feldman also accused Brenda van Dam of muttering a curse word at one of Westerfield's friends who testified earlier this week.

Prosecutor Jeff Dusek told Mudd that Brenda van Dam denies making any such comment and a victim witness advocate who accompanies her each day backs up her account.

Testimony in the Westerfield trial is on hold until July 22 when Mudd returns from a vacation. At Thursday's hearing, Feldman said he expects the defense will take two or three days more before resting its case. Prosecutors may then present rebuttal witnesses before closing arguments begin sometime in late July or early August.

 

Contact staff writer Kimberly Epler at (760) 739-6644 or kepler@nctimes.com.

7/12/02


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS: 180frank; vandam; westerfield
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 621-640641-660661-680 ... 701-707 next last
To: cyncooper
Good to know. Have never seen her before I started to watch this trial. Thanks.

When I say she is the most fair I'm only talking about her coverage on this trial.
641 posted on 07/14/2002 9:45:45 PM PDT by gigi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 637 | View Replies]

To: cyncooper
If the dog DNA don't fit, you must acquit!
642 posted on 07/14/2002 9:45:51 PM PDT by John Jamieson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 640 | View Replies]

To: gigi; Henrietta
Most lawyers are "that way". LOL


Henrietta, I said MOST.
643 posted on 07/14/2002 9:50:34 PM PDT by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 641 | View Replies]

To: All
Forgot about this question from PH..BVD by Feldman..

12 Q YOU'RE AWARE THAT LAW ENFORCEMENT

13 INTERVIEWED YOUR OTHER CHILDREN; IS THAT RIGHT?

14 A YES.

15 Q IS IT CORRECT THAT YOUR DAUGHTER DANIELLE

16 GOT IN TROUBLE BECAUSE SHE WOULD LEAVE THE HOUSE AND

17 NOT COME BACK UNTIL YOU FOUND HER ON OTHER

18 OCCASIONS?

19 A NO.

20 Q ONE OF YOUR CHILDREN'S NAME IS DYLEN; IS

21 THAT CORRECT, MA'AM?

22 A YES.

23 Q HAVE YOU TALKED TO DYLEN ABOUT WHETHER OR

24 NOT HE HAD A CONVERSATION WITH LAW ENFORCEMENT

25 CONCERNING YOUR DAUGHTER'S ACTIVITIES?

26 MR. DUSEK: OBJECTION; IMPROPER IMPEACHMENT.

27 MR. FELDMAN: I'LL WITHDRAW THE QUESTION.

644 posted on 07/14/2002 9:58:19 PM PDT by Rheo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 641 | View Replies]

To: Rheo
I've been reading the bug man's testimony. Dusek seemed to be hinting at weather differences before and after the 16th. In otherwords, was the weather so hostel that the flys had to wait until about the 16th, even though he thinks the body was there from the 2d or 3d? Can we find weather data that shows that the average temperature was about the same or cooler from 2 to 15 verses the 16 to 28 time period? What days (if any) had significant rain? I think the housing development and golf course nearby really kill the aurgument anyway, but I find it interesting, none the less.

645 posted on 07/15/2002 2:07:19 AM PDT by John Jamieson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 644 | View Replies]

To: John Jamieson
graphs

Looks like it rained on the 17th.

646 posted on 07/15/2002 3:02:13 AM PDT by dread78645
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 645 | View Replies]

To: Rheo
I found enough data to do my own calculations:
All data is from Miramar about 20 to 30 miles from Dehesa, closest I could find!

for 2/2 to 2/15:
Average temp 56F(13.3C)
Average dew point 34(1.1C)
Relative Humidity Calc = 44%

For 2/16 to 2/28:
Average temp 58.6F (14.8C)
Average dew point 44.5(7.0C)
Relative Humidity Calc = 60%

Conclusions: The temperature in late Feb was a little higher as you would expect. The first part of Feb was very dry, maybe causing the mumification. The humidity in late Feb was wetter (although still dry by most standards).

The most interesting thing I found: The only day it rained was Feb 17th (.17 inches)! Facts is facts.
647 posted on 07/15/2002 3:06:46 AM PDT by John Jamieson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 644 | View Replies]

To: John Jamieson
The only day it rained was Feb 17th (.17 inches)! Facts is facts.

Ya think Dusek wants to claim the rain killed off the beetles ?

648 posted on 07/15/2002 3:37:31 AM PDT by dread78645
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 647 | View Replies]

To: All
Everyone should feel sorry for David Westerfield.

All those strange magical forces came together to form a unfortunate, unprecedented case of absolutely incredible coincidental bad luck that decided to fall on Dave and crush him. He's the unluckiest man in the history of criminal trials.

Fingerprints, DNA, blood, fibers, dirty dancing, girl scout cookie selling, bleach smells, bar meetings, zig zag desert trip, illegal porno collecting etc, all coming down against him in a horrible coincidental avalanche of misfortune....

Dave now tops O.J. for the unluckiest of ALL TIME. It's just terrible. You have our sympathy Dave.

649 posted on 07/15/2002 4:29:46 AM PDT by Greg Weston
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 648 | View Replies]

To: Greg Weston
You're getting there Greg Weston. All those things can and have been reasonably explained, and most are absolutely innocent in any circumstance, even without any explanation. Are your shades drawn? Is you hose out?

For Westerfield's lynch mob those mundane questions became the most grave accusations.

650 posted on 07/15/2002 5:45:11 AM PDT by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 649 | View Replies]

To: gigi
gigi, EXCELLENT work! CTV and Beth Karas need to do a retraction, and Whorealdo does too.

Misstating the facts in this case to the general uninformed public is going to cause a great deal of harm to the Defense.

So what is the big deal about DW telling LE, when he was with them that "this would be a good place to dump a body"..?

Pure speculation, but a good one.

As far as I'm concerned, I didn't do it!

sw

651 posted on 07/15/2002 5:45:14 AM PDT by spectre
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 594 | View Replies]

To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
Kim, Rick Roberts was correct about the parents. When this trial is over, you are going to hear just about everything you never wanted to know about HOW BAD they actually are. Information that was NOT allowed to be introduced in this trial because of the GAG order OR Judge Mudd's decision to only go back "so far" with the evidence Feldman has against these two.

If DW is convicted, he has the right to appeal, and by then, oh yes...by then, we will know much more about Damon and Brenda.

They'll be all over the air-ways blabbing about themselves...but so will others.

You obviously have not listened to the talk shows, where most of the guests are concluding the Van Dams life style "invited" trouble into their home...

I think it's way past time for the Defense to get a Forensic Psychologist as a witness for the Defense...

The Prosecution is afraid to do it!

sw

652 posted on 07/15/2002 6:03:05 AM PDT by spectre
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 619 | View Replies]

To: the Deejay
Morning DJ;

Now what idiot cop would insinuate("only the killer would know") such a statement about the dance??

Could be the same cop that gave us the "overwhelming bleach"in the MH scenario,the "throughly cleaned" MH. "the dog with a heck of a nose" find a scent of the perp in Danielle's bedroom,cop.

653 posted on 07/15/2002 6:09:10 AM PDT by BARLF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 590 | View Replies]

To: BARLF
Or the same cop(s) that only went after DW for the porn initially...that being the first Search Warrant filed on the 5th. I wonder what gave them the idea in the first place?

Things that make ya go "hmmmmmmm...."
654 posted on 07/15/2002 6:24:33 AM PDT by ItsOurTimeNow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 653 | View Replies]

To: ItsOurTimeNow
Yeah, there is a great many hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm's in this case.DW may be guilty as charged but "as far as I am concerned" the prosecution hasn't proved it yet.
655 posted on 07/15/2002 6:33:47 AM PDT by BARLF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 654 | View Replies]

To: John Jamieson
JJ, check the Feb Weather page for temps at Dehesa/ El Cajon for the month.

Stealth Ninja Dave

656 posted on 07/15/2002 6:43:45 AM PDT by Jaded
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 645 | View Replies]

To: Jaded; All
NEW THREAD!
657 posted on 07/15/2002 6:59:52 AM PDT by MizSterious
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 656 | View Replies]

To: John Jamieson
Thanks JJ, I had already tried rebooting...and I was trying to reply to your reboot post, when the the cable went down. BUMMMER!!! It just now came back on.. ...am watching the trafficant and the ethics committee battle it out right now
658 posted on 07/15/2002 8:04:30 AM PDT by Freedom2specul8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 638 | View Replies]

To: BARLF
Good Morning--

About Barbara--- "COMFORTABLE" or "UNCOMFORTABLE" who to believe????

Feldman says: "And in fact, Barbara Easton starts talking to Danielle Van Dam, and Brenda Van Dam later tells police "that was making me very UNCOMFORTABLE. I don't want her talking to my daughter." This woman talking to my daughter? Huh-uh. SHE DIDN'T EVEN KNOW HER."

Brenda STRONGLY objected to Barbara's attention toward Danielle. (The whole scene causes me to think that maybe Barbara was not just simply speaking verbally to Danielle, but maybe physically doing something to her.)

Dusek asks Brenda: Q:"....Is it the case that your relationship with her was such that you were uncomfortable when she was talking with your daughter, Danielle? A: It just struck me as odd because she didn't--she wasn't around my children that much. (so why be upset about her just talking?)

Later Dusek asks Brenda: Q: "Were you concerned about the safety of your daughter with Barbara being around her? A: No

Then Denise states that they left the house soooo early that Friday 8:30 and arrived at the bar soooo early that they still had family's there. (There were KIDS at tables near the bar) (--I think Brenda was very UPSET so she quickly ushered Barbara out of the house.)

Later,at the bar, when they were dancing and carousing occurs, Brenda gets real UNCOMFORTABLE with Barbara again. At 2:00AM in the Van Dam's Barbara gets real COMFORTABLE with Damon. This makes Brenda UNCOMFORTABLE again, she goes up and gets them, tells them their are rude.

According to Feldman: Barbara will testify that she had a long standing (COMFORTABLE)-relationship with both Damon and Brenda. Brenda stated that she first met Barbara, Aug. 2001 and that they caroused that night at Dad's as well.






659 posted on 07/15/2002 8:07:34 AM PDT by juzcuz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 655 | View Replies]

To: spectre
I have no doubts more stuff will leak about the parents and DW after the trial... whether or not they brought strangers into the house on the other hand is one of the questions we need answered to get the mystery overwith.

I've heard a few commontators make various comments about the parents lifestyle. ....I still maintain molestors don't care what the parents do...if they find a weakness, they will exploit it..whether the parents are gone all the time volunteering or bar hopping. If they think the child can be gotten, the child will be had.

660 posted on 07/15/2002 8:11:57 AM PDT by Freedom2specul8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 652 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 621-640641-660661-680 ... 701-707 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson