Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: cyncooper
Mind you, I look at dogs as tools and not proof. But even on 2/4, the comforters had been removed and DW had engaged in self-admitted cleaning.

This extensive cleaning that left the hairs of other people but vacuumed up all of hers, that were not found in the vacuum cleaner.

The fresh blood of the murder was on the floor, the fibers of whatever her body had been wrapped around, the prints of unidentified people were still there so cleaning was really effective.

So did the wind whip thru the storage compartments on the 25 mile trip frm Dehesa to the storage place..or was her dead body in the MH until 2/4 and his "extensive cleaning" got rid of the urine/fecal matter from death and the blood of the rape with no smell of cleaning fluids?

The dry cleaner comforters that cleaned away all of her trace but left the short and long black hairs, brown, white and blonde hairs.

He is one heck of a selective cleaner.

579 posted on 07/12/2002 5:45:58 PM PDT by Rheo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 553 | View Replies ]


To: Rheo
I never said "extensive cleaning" and you put it in quotes as if I did. I said "self-admitted" meaning DW told the police he took his vacuum and went to do some cleaning. As you point out, even dry-cleaning doesn't remove every piece of stuff that happens to be on it.
618 posted on 07/12/2002 7:02:27 PM PDT by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 579 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson