[RnMomof7]

But in the next breath, Lisa makes a big deal out of saying that IF Westerfields son testifies that it was HIS porn on the computer..then he should be punished...about a year in prison...for down-loading porn!

Do we know the age of the "kids " in the porn? If they were adolesant in appearance..seems that would not be a "sign of preversion" for a 15-18 year old..That would be his age group...a whole different ball game than 7 yr olds!

(not saying porn is ok..but an observation on the age thing)

[spectre]

I agree. And as disgusting as it is..it may point to Neal and not David Westerfield. There goes the DA's motive.

sw